Trial reportClinical therapeutics2017
Combination Therapy of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.
Trial report in Clinical therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04826354 (Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Low/Moderate-Intensity Statin plus Ezetimibe Combination Therapy vs. High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination versus Quadruple-Dose Rosuvastatin Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of statin in combination with ezetimibe compared with double-dose statin in patients with high cardiovascular risk: A meta-analysis.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe in patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III clinical trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Trial
- Efficacy of Dyslipidemia Control by Combination Therapy with Rosuvastatin 10 Mg and Ezetimibe 10 Mg Compared with Rosuvastatin 20 Mg Monotherapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized, Single-blind Controlled Trial.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024 · on this mapTrial
- Trial
- A Bioequivalence Study of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin Fixed Dose Combination (10 mg/10 mg) Versus the Individual Formulations Taken Concomitantly.Advances in therapy · 2023Trial
- Chinese expert consensus on the choice of initial cholesterol-lowering strategy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of combination therapy Ezetimibe 10/rosuvastatin 40 in Egyptian patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Lipid profile and safety of rosuvastatin monotherapy versus rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe in high risk coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025Review
- Ezetimibe plus statin combination versus double-dose statin in patients with dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 randomized controlled trials.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
- Treatment adherence, persistence, and effectiveness of fixed dose combination versus free combination therapy of rosuvastatin-ezetimibe as a lipid-lowering therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Rosuvastatin-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for the Control of LDL Cholesterol in Patients at High Vascular Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial From Korea.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2023Article
- Review
- Tailoring Multi-omics to Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: All for One and One for All.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2022Article
- Is it Time for Single-Pill Combinations in Dyslipidemia?American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy in Korean patients with high cardiovascular risk.
methodsThis was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. A total of 337 patients were screened. After a 4-week run-in period, 245 of these patients with high or moderately high risk as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines were randomly assigned. Patients received 1 of 6 regimens for 8 weeks as follows: (1) rosuvastatin 5 mg, (2) rosuvastatin 5 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg, (3) rosuvastatin 10 mg, (4) rosuvastatin 10 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg, (5) rosuvastatin 20 mg, or (6) rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg. The primary outcome variable was percentage change in the level of LDL-C at week 8 of drug treatment. Secondary outcome variables included percentage changes of other lipid variables and achievement rates of LDL-C targets. Tolerability analyses were also performed.
findingsThe percentage change of LDL-C ranged from -45% to -56% (mean, -51%) in the monotherapy groups and from -58% to -63% (mean, -60%) in the combination therapy groups. The percentage change was greater in the pooled combination therapy group than in the counterpart (P < 0.001 for the pooled groups); this difference was more obvious for regimens with a lower statin dose. The percentage reductions of total cholesterol and triglycerides were greater in the combination groups than in the monotherapy groups. The LDL-C target achievement rates were 64% to 87% (mean, 73%) in the monotherapy groups and 87% to 95% (mean, 91%) in the combination groups (P = 0.01 for the pooled groups). The rates were significantly greater in patients receiving the combination therapy than in the monotherapy at lower doses of rosuvastatin. The proportions of patients with various adverse events were not significantly different between the groups. IMPLICATIONS: Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy has better efficacy and target achievement rates than rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with high cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28007331What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.