Trial reportJAMA cardiology2017

Association of Fenofibrate Therapy With Long-term Cardiovascular Risk in Statin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Marshall B Elam, Henry N Ginsberg, Laura C Lovato, Marshall Corson, Joseph Largay, Lawrence A Leiter, Carlos Lopez, Patrick J O'Connor, Mary Ellen Sweeney, Daniel Weiss and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it supports the treatment in 1. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT00000620. Cited by 80 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.51 · no effect
CVDfenofibrate vs placebo, in study participants with dyslipidemia, defined as triglyceride levels greater than 204 mg/dL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels less than 34 mg/dLfavours the treatment · ascvd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.730.56 to 0.95
Despite these overall neutral results, we continued to find evidence that fenofibrate therapy effectively reduced CVD in study participants with dyslipidemia, defined as triglyceride levels greater than 204 mg/dL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels less than 34 mg/dL (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Other lipid agents×lipids

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

28 readable studies in this cell: 17 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 9 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 17 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.50This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT004793881,216 enrolled · 2007
Δ -4.50-7.70 to -1.30
NCT00862251808 enrolled · 2009
Percent change in least-square means -14.8-19.6 to -9.91
NCT00485758796 enrolled · 2007
Δ -17.9-21.4 to -14.4
NCT00730132712 enrolled · 2008
Δ -5.75-9.43 to -2.07
NCT01763827615 enrolled · 2013
Δ -39.3-43.3 to -35.3
NCT01984424511 enrolled · 2013
Δ -37.8-42.3 to -33.3
NCT06005597407 enrolled · 2024
Least Squares (LS) Means -27.9-37.5 to -18.4
NCT03337308382 enrolled · 2017
Δ -38.0-46.5 to -29.6
NCT02227784366 enrolled · 2014
Δ -6.14-12.2 to -0.22
NCT01763905307 enrolled · 2013
Δ -38.1-43.7 to -33.0
NCT03001076269 enrolled · 2016
Δ -28.4-34.4 to -22.5

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000620 phase3completed

Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)

Ran1999Enrolled10,251Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons6ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Diabetes MellitusArmsAnti-hyperglycemic Agents, Anti-hypertensive Agents, Blinded fenofibrate or placebo plus simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Fibrates : Do They Still Have a Role in Therapy in 2025?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with comorbidities-facing the challenge.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Marshall B ElamMemphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis.
Henry N GinsbergColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Laura C LovatoWake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest, North Carolina.
Marshall CorsonUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Joseph LargayUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Lawrence A LeiterLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute and Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carlos LopezColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Patrick J O'ConnorHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mary Ellen SweeneyAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Daniel WeissDiabetes Endocrine Nutrition Group, Mentor, Ohio.
William T FriedewaldColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
John B BuseUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Hertzel C GersteinMcMaster Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey ProbstfieldUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Richard GrimmBerman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Faramarz Ismail-BeigiCleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
David C GoffColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado.
Jerome L FlegNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Yves RosenbergNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert P ByingtonWake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest, North Carolina.
ACCORDION Study Investigators
Columbia University · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWake Forest University · USBerman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research · USColorado School of Public Health · USDiabetes & Endocrine Associates · USHealthPartners · USMcMaster University Medical Centre · CASeattle University · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USUniversity of Washington · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95178NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95179NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95180NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95181NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95182NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95183NHLBI NIH HHS N01HC95184
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Importance: Patients with type 2 diabetes are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in part owing to hypertriglyceridemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. It is unknown whether adding triglyceride-lowering treatment to statin reduces this risk. Objective: To determine whether fenofibrate reduces CVD risk in statin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Posttrial follow-up of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid Study between July 2009 and October 2014; 5 years of follow-up were completed for a total of 9.7 years at general community and academic outpatient research clinics in the United States and Canada. Of the original 5518 ACCORD Lipid Trial participants, 4644 surviving participants were selected based on the presence of type 2 diabetes and either prevalent CVD or CVD risk factors and high-density lipoprotein levels less than 50 mg/dL (<55 mg/dL for women and African American individuals). Interventions: Passive follow-up of study participants previously treated with fenofibrate or masked placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Occurrence of cardiovascular outcomes including primary composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in all participants and in prespecified subgroups. Results: The 4644 follow-on study participants were broadly representative of the original ACCORD study population and included significant numbers of women (n = 1445; 31%), nonwhite individuals (n = 1094; 21%), and those with preexisting cardiovascular events (n = 1620; 35%). Only 4.3% of study participants continued treatment with fenofibrate following completion of ACCORD. High-density lipoprotein and triglyceride values rapidly equalized among participants originally randomized to fenofibrate or placebo. Over a median total postrandomization follow-up of 9.7 years, the hazard ratio (HR) for the primary study outcome among participants originally randomized to fenofibrate vs placebo (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.05; P = .25) was comparable with that originally observed in ACCORD (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79-1,08; P = .32). Despite these overall neutral results, we continued to find evidence that fenofibrate therapy effectively reduced CVD in study participants with dyslipidemia, defined as triglyceride levels greater than 204 mg/dL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels less than 34 mg/dL (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance: Extended follow-up of ACCORD-lipid trial participants confirms the original neutral effect of fenofibrate in the overall study cohort. The continued observation of heterogeneity of treatment response by baseline lipids suggests that fenofibrate therapy may reduce CVD in patients with diabetes with hypertriglyceridemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. A definitive trial of fibrate therapy in this patient population is needed to confirm these findings. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000620.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationDyslipidemiasFemaleFenofibrateFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsMaleBiomarkersFenofibrateHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLipids

Identifiers

PMID28030716
PMCPMC5470410
OpenAlexW2562899840

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.