Evidence mapPaperPMID 28030849Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Combined and individual tumor-specific expression of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, insulin receptor and phospho-insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/insulin receptor in primary breast cancer: Implications for prognosis in different treatment groups.

Sofie Björner, Ann H Rosendahl, Maria Simonsson, Andrea Markkula, Karin Jirström, Signe Borgquist, Carsten Rose, Christian Ingvar, Helena Jernström

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sofie BjörnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Ann H RosendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Maria SimonssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Andrea MarkkulaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Karin JirströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Signe BorgquistDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Carsten RoseCREATE Health and Department of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Christian IngvarDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Surgery, Lund, Sweden.
Helena JernströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Oncology and Pathology, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials examining insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF1R)-targeting strategies have emphasized that better predictive biomarkers are required to improve patient selection.Immunohistochemical tumor-specific protein expression of IGF1R, insulin receptor (InsR), and phosphorylated IGF1R/InsR (pIGF1R/InsR) individually and combined in relation to breast cancer prognosis was evaluated in a population-based cohort of 1,026 primary invasive breast cancer patients without preoperative treatment diagnosed in Sweden. IGF1R (n = 923), InsR (n = 900), and pIGF1R/InsR (n = 904) combined cytoplasmic and membrane staining was dichotomized. IGF1Rstrong/InsRmod/strong/pIGF1R/InsRpos tumors were borderline associated with 2-fold risk for events, HRadj (2.00; 95%CI 0.96-4.18). Combined IGF1R and pIGF1R/InsR status only impacted prognosis in patients with InsRmod/strong expressing tumors (Pinteraction = 0.041). IGF1Rstrong expression impacted endocrine treatment response differently depending on patients' age and type of endocrine therapy. Phospho-IGF1R/InsRpos was associated with lower risk for events among non-endocrine-treated patients irrespective of ER status, HRadj (0.32; 95%CI 0.16-0.63), but not among endocrine-treated patients (Pinteraction = 0.024). In non-endocrine-treated patients, pIGF1R/InsRpos was associated with lower risk for events after radiotherapy, HRadj (0.31; 95%CI 0.12-0.80), and chemotherapy, HRadj (0.29; 95%CI 0.09-0.99). This study highlights the complexity of IGF hetero-and homodimer signaling network and its interplay with endocrine treatment, suggesting that combinations of involved factors may improve patient selection for IGF1R-targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasm InvasivenessPhosphorylationPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapyReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinAntigens, CDAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorIGF1R protein, humanINSR protein, humanReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Somatomedinbreast cancerinsulin-like growth factor-I receptorinsulin receptorphospho-insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/insulin receptorprognosis

Identifiers

PMID28030849
PMCPMC5354717
OpenAlexW2566253560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.