Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28034796›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2017

Mechanics and regulation of cytokinesis in budding yeast.

Yogini P Bhavsar-Jog, Erfei Bi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Roles of Septins in Regulating Fission Yeast Cytokinesis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TOR Complex 1: Orchestrating Nutrient Signaling and Cell Cycle Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Virus-induced cell gigantism and asymmetric cell division in archaea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yogini P Bhavsar-JogDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Erfei BiDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: ebi@mail.med.upenn.edu.

Funding

Mechanistic Analysis of Cytokinesis in EukaryotesR01GM115420 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BI, ERFEI · 2015 to 2022
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytokinesis is essential for the survival of all organisms. It requires concerted functions of cell signaling, force production, exocytosis, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Due to the conservation in core components and mechanisms between fungal and animal cells, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has served as an attractive model for studying this fundamental process. In this review, we discuss the mechanics and regulation of distinct events of cytokinesis in budding yeast, including the assembly, constriction, and disassembly of the actomyosin ring, septum formation, abscission, and their spatiotemporal coordination. We also highlight the key concepts and questions that are common to animal and fungal cytokinesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomycetalesActinActomyosin ringCell separationChitinELCExocytosisForminIQGAPMitotic exitMyosinRLCSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSeptinSeptum formation

Identifiers

PMID28034796
PMCPMC5474357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.