Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28035425›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2017

Myocardial stress perfusion magnetic resonance: initial experience in a pediatric and young adult population using regadenoson.

Cory V Noel, Ramkumar Krishnamurthy, Brady Moffett, Rajesh Krishnamurthy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Membrane mimetic-dependence of GPCR energy landscapes.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2024
    Article
  5. Membrane Mimetic-Dependence of GPCR Energy Landscapes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Myocardial Functional Imaging in Pediatric Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AStructure (London, England : 1993) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Safety and TJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cory V NoelDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. cvnoel@texaschildrens.org.
Ramkumar KrishnamurthyDepartment of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Brady MoffettDepartment of Pharmacology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Rajesh KrishnamurthyDepartment of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Texas Children's Hospital · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDipyridamole and adenosine are traditional pharmacological stressors for myocardial perfusion. Regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, has a lower side effect profile with lower incidence of bronchospasm and bradycardia. There is a growing need for myocardial perfusion assessment within pediatrics. There is no report on the utility of regadenoson as a stress agent in children.

objectiveTo observe the safety and feasibility of regadenoson as a pharmacologic stressor for perfusion cardiac MR in a pilot cohort of pediatric patients weighing more than 40 kg who have congenital heart disease and pediatric acquired heart disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe reviewed our initial experience with regadenoson stress cardiac MR in 31 pediatric patients 15.8 ± 1.7 years (range 12-22 years) with congenital heart disease and acquired heart disease. Mean patient weight was 60 ± 15 kg (range of 40-93 kg). All patients underwent cardiac MR because of concern for ischemia. The cohort included a heterogeneous group of patients at a pediatric institution with potential risk for ischemia. Subjects' heart rate and blood pressure were monitored and pharmacologic stress was induced by injection of 400 mcg of regadenoson. We evaluated their hemodynamic response and adverse effects using changes in vital signs and onset of symptoms. A pediatric cardiologist and radiologist qualitatively assessed myocardial perfusion and viability images.

resultsOne child was unable to complete the stress perfusion portion of the examination, but did complete the remaining portion of the CMR. Resting heart rate was 72 ± 14 beats per minute (bpm) and rose to peak of 124 ± 17 bpm (95 ± 50% increase, P < 0.005) with regadenoson. Image quality was considered good or diagnostic in all cases. Three patients had irreversible perfusion defects. Four patients had reversible perfusion defects. Nine of the patients underwent cardiac catheterization with angiography and the findings showed excellent agreement.

conclusionRegadenoson might be a safe and feasible pharmacologic stress agent for use in cardiac MR in older pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and acquired heart disease. The ease of use as a bolus and the advantage of a prolonged hyperemia make its use appealing in pediatrics. In a limited number of cases, regadenoson stress perfusion showed excellent agreement with cardiac catheterization. Regadenoson might be a viable pharmacologic stress agent in this population.

Indexed as

Adenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsAdolescentCardiovascular DiseasesChildExercise TestFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePilot ProjectsPurinesPyrazolesYoung AdultAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsPurinesPyrazolesregadenosonAcquired coronary artery diseaseChildrenCongenital heart diseaseHeartMagnetic resonance imagingPharmacologic stressRegadenosonStress perfusion

Identifiers

PMID28035425
OpenAlexW2565191970

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.