Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28043702›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2017

Understanding arsenic dynamics in agronomic systems to predict and prevent uptake by crop plants.

Tracy Punshon, Brian P Jackson, Andrew A Meharg, Todd Warczack, Kirk Scheckel, Mary Lou Guerinot

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tracy PunshonDartmouth College, Department of Biology, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: tracy.punshon@dartmouth.edu.
Brian P JacksonDartmouth College, Department of Earth Sciences, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: bpj@dartmouth.edu.
Andrew A MehargInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5HN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: aa.meharg@qub.ac.uk.
Todd WarczackDartmouth College, Department of Biology, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: Todd.M.Warczack.GR@dartmouth.edu.
Kirk ScheckelUSEPA Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45224, USA. Electronic address: scheckel.kirk@epa.gov.
Mary Lou GuerinotDartmouth College, Department of Biology, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: mary.lou.guerinot@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

VARIATION IN BIOACCUMULATION AND BIOMAGNIFICATION OF METALS IN NORTHERN US LAKESP42ES007373 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI KARAGAS, MARGARET RITA · 1995 to 2019
$52.0M
Relation Between In-utero Vitamin D and Immune Function in Early Childhood P20GM104416 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SALAS DIAZ, LUCAS A · 2013 to 2022
$23.7M
Project 3: Placental Biomarkers of Exposure and Outcome (Marsit)P01ES022832 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI KARAGAS, MARGARET RITA · 2013 to 2018
$4.7M
Collaborative on Food with Arsenic and Associated Risk and RegulationR13ES026493 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHEN, CELIA Y · 2016 to 2016
$20k
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES022832NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007373NIEHS NIH HHS R13 ES026493NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is on arsenic in agronomic systems, and covers processes that influence the entry of arsenic into the human food supply. The scope is from sources of arsenic (natural and anthropogenic) in soils, biogeochemical and rhizosphere processes that control arsenic speciation and availability, through to mechanisms of uptake by crop plants and potential mitigation strategies. This review makes a case for taking steps to prevent or limit crop uptake of arsenic, wherever possible, and to work toward a long-term solution to the presence of arsenic in agronomic systems. The past two decades have seen important advances in our understanding of how biogeochemical and physiological processes influence human exposure to soil arsenic, and this must now prompt an informed reconsideration and unification of regulations to protect the quality of agricultural and residential soils.

Indexed as

ArsenicCrops, AgriculturalRhizosphereSoilSoil PollutantsArsenicSoilSoil PollutantsAgricultureArsenicMitigationPlantsSoilSources

Identifiers

PMID28043702
PMCPMC5303541
OpenAlexW2566528747

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.