SynthesisPloS one2017
Prediction Models and Their External Validation Studies for Mortality of Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- External validation of a predictive model for post-treatment persistent disease byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Observational
- Prediction Models for One-Year Survival of Adult Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Longitudinal Study Based on the Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III Database.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Application of interpretable machine learning for early prediction of prognosis in acute kidney injury.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- The potential for artificial intelligence to predict clinical outcomes in patients who have acquired acute kidney injury during the perioperative period.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2021Article
- Integrating electronic health data records to develop and validate a predictive model of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury in non-critically ill patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Article
- External validation of the Madrid Acute Kidney Injury Prediction Score.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Article
- Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Prediction models for acute kidney injury in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a real-world study based on Bayesian networks.Renal failure · 2020Article
- A novel machine learning algorithm, Bayesian networks model, to predict the high-risk patients with cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
- Stigma, biomarkers, and algorithmic bias: recommendations for precision behavioral health with artificial intelligence.JAMIA open · 2020Article
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Article
- Negative Regulation of Tec Kinase Alleviates LPS-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Mice via theTLR4/NF-BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019Article
- Predicting Outcomes in Acute Kidney Injury Survivors: Searching for the Crystal Ball.Kidney international reports · 2019Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for the probability of responding to placebo in antidepressant trials: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.Evidence-based mental health · 2019Article
- Causal risk factor discovery for severe acute kidney injury using electronic health records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Definition, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury: An International Survey of Nephrologists.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically review AKI outcome prediction models and their external validation studies, to describe the discrepancy of reported accuracy between the results of internal and external validations, and to identify variables frequently included in the prediction models.
methodsWe searched the MEDLINE and Web of Science electronic databases (until January 2016). Studies were eligible if they derived a model to predict mortality of AKI patients or externally validated at least one of the prediction models, and presented area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUROC) to assess model discrimination. Studies were excluded if they described only results of logistic regression without reporting a scoring system, or if a prediction model was generated from a specific cohort.
resultsA total of 2204 potentially relevant articles were found and screened, of which 12 articles reporting original prediction models for hospital mortality in AKI patients and nine articles assessing external validation were selected. Among the 21 studies for AKI prediction models and their external validation, 12 were single-center (57%), and only three included more than 1,000 patients (14%). The definition of AKI was not uniform and none used recently published consensus criteria for AKI. Although good performance was reported in their internal validation, most of the prediction models had poor discrimination with an AUROC below 0.7 in the external validation studies. There were 10 common non-renal variables that were reported in more than three prediction models: mechanical ventilation, age, gender, hypotension, liver failure, oliguria, sepsis/septic shock, low albumin, consciousness and low platelet count.
conclusionsInformation in this systematic review should be useful for future prediction model derivation by providing potential candidate predictors, and for future external validation by listing up the published prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.