Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28060581›Full record

Trial reportJournal of health communication2017

Face-to-Face and Online Networks: College Students' Experiences in a Weight-Loss Trial.

Gina Merchant, Nadir Weibel, Laura Pina, William G Griswold, James H Fowler, Guadalupe X Ayala, Linda C Gallo, James Hollan, Kevin Patrick

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of health communication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Identifying Social Media-Based Interactions That Help Adults to Adhere to Weight Loss Goals: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gina Merchanta Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Qualcomm Institute/Calit 2 , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.
Nadir Weibela Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Qualcomm Institute/Calit 2 , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.
Laura Pinaa Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Qualcomm Institute/Calit 2 , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.
William G Griswolda Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Qualcomm Institute/Calit 2 , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.
James H Fowlera Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Qualcomm Institute/Calit 2 , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.
Guadalupe X Ayalae Division of Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health , San Diego State University , San Diego , California , USA.
Linda C Gallof San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology , San Diego , California , USA.
James Hollang Department of Cognitive Science , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.
Kevin Patricka Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Qualcomm Institute/Calit 2 , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California , USA.

Funding

SMART: A Social and Mobile Weight Control Program for Young AdultsU01HL096715 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PATRICK, KEVIN · 2009 to 2013
$4.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL096715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to understand how college students participating in a 2-year randomized controlled trial (Project SMART: Social and Mobile Approach to Reduce Weight; N = 404) engaged their social networks and used social and mobile technologies to try and lose weight. Participants in the present study (n = 20 treatment, n = 18 control) were approached after a measurement visit and administered semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed using principles from grounded theory. Treatment group participants appreciated the timely support provided by the study and the integration of content across multiple technologies. Participants in both groups reported using non-study-designed apps to help them lose weight, and many participants knew one another outside of the study. Individuals talked about weight-loss goals with their friends face to face and felt accountable to follow through with their intentions. Although seeing others' success online motivated many, there was a range of perceived acceptability in talking about personal health-related information on social media. The findings from this qualitative study can inform intervention trials using social and mobile technologies to promote weight loss. For example, weight-loss trials should measure participants' use of direct-to-consumer technologies and interconnectivity so that treatment effects can be isolated and cross-contamination accounted for.

Indexed as

InternetInterpersonal RelationsSocial SupportAdolescentCaliforniaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleObesityOverweightQualitative ResearchStudentsTreatment OutcomeUniversitiesWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID28060581
PMCPMC6534122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.