Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28061840›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2017

Evaluating the effectiveness of an empowerment program for self-care in type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomized trial.

Daniel Nogueira Cortez, Maísa Mara Lopes Macedo, Débora Aparecida Silva Souza, Jéssica Caroline Dos Santos, Gesana Sousa Afonso, Ilka Afonso Reis, Heloísa de Carvalho Torres

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02132338 (Evaluation of the Educational Program of Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02132338 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Educational Program of Diabetes Mellitus: Focus on Empowerment

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Minas GeraisRan2014 to 2017Enrolled191ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsThe Education Health Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2021.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Nogueira CortezFederal University of São João del-Rei (Centro Oeste Campus), Divinópolis, Brasil. danielcortez@ufsj.edu.br.
Maísa Mara Lopes MacedoSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Débora Aparecida Silva SouzaSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jéssica Caroline Dos SantosSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gesana Sousa AfonsoSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ilka Afonso ReisInstitute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Heloísa de Carvalho TorresSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing substantially worldwide, leading to serious economic effects, complications and deaths. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an empowerment program providing support for psychosocial, behavioral, and clinical aspects of diabetes to help Brazilian users of public health services obtain metabolic control of this condition.

methodsIn this cluster randomized trial, participants aged 30-80 diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were recruited from ten Brazilian public health units in 2014 and 2015. Five units were randomly assigned to receive the empowerment program based on a behavior change protocol, and five continued to receive only conventional treatment. The primary outcome was the biochemical and anthropometric parameters, and the secondary outcomes were self-care, attitude, knowledge and empowerment related to diabetes. The effect of the experiment was defined as the percentage variation between the values at the initial and final periods. To evaluate this effect and to compare it in the two groups, tests were used for paired and independent samples, respectively.

resultsThere were 238 participants: 127 and 111 in the intervention and control group, respectively. For glycated hemoglobin, the mean effect in the control and intervention groups was 3.93 and -5.13, respectively (p < 0.001). Levels of glycated hemoglobin and other metabolic indicators, as well as the most part of the secondary outcomes showed a significant difference in the experimental group compared to the control group.

conclusionsThe empowerment program improved metabolic control of type 2 diabetes in Brazilian users.

trial registrationNCT02132338 - April 22, 2014.

Indexed as

Power, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCluster AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSelf CareDiabetes type 2Health educationPrimary health careRandomized controlled trialSelf care

Identifiers

PMID28061840
PMCPMC5219728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.