Evidence mapPaperPMID 28067189Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2018

Common mental health problems in rural-to-urban migrant workers in Shenzhen, China: prevalence and risk factors.

B L Zhong, T B Liu, S S M Chan, D Jin, C Y Hu, J Dai, H F K Chiu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Residential Environment and Health and Well-Being of Chinese Migrant Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Social Capital and Mental Wellbeing of Older People Migrating along with Adult Children in Shenzhen, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B L ZhongDepartment of Psychiatry,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong SAR,People's Republic of China.
T B LiuShenzhen Key Laboratory for Psychological Healthcare,Shenzhen Institute of Mental Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen Mental Health Center,Shenzhen,People's Republic of China.
S S M ChanDepartment of Psychiatry,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong SAR,People's Republic of China.
D JinShenzhen Key Laboratory for Psychological Healthcare,Shenzhen Institute of Mental Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen Mental Health Center,Shenzhen,People's Republic of China.
C Y HuShenzhen Key Laboratory for Psychological Healthcare,Shenzhen Institute of Mental Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen Mental Health Center,Shenzhen,People's Republic of China.
J DaiShenzhen Key Laboratory for Psychological Healthcare,Shenzhen Institute of Mental Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen Mental Health Center,Shenzhen,People's Republic of China.
H F K ChiuDepartment of Psychiatry,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong SAR,People's Republic of China.
Shenzhen KangNing Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRural-to-urban migrant workers are a large marginalised population in urban China. Prevalence estimates of common mental health problems (CMHPs) in previous studies varied widely and very few studies have investigated migration-related factors of CMHPs in migrant workers. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of CMHPs among Chinese migrant workers.

methodsA random sample of 3031 migrant workers of ten manufacturing factories in Shenzhen, China, completed a standardised questionnaire containing socio-demographic and migration-related variables and the Chinese 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). A GHQ-12 score of three or higher was used to denote the presence of CMHPs.

resultsThe prevalence of CMHPs was 34.4% in Chinese migrant workers. In multiple logistic regression, risk factors for CMHPs included being 16-25 years old (odd ratio [OR] 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28, 2.12), being 26-35 years old (OR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.75), low monthly income (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04, 1.92), poor living condition (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.54), physical illness in the past 2 weeks (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.43, 2.05), having worked in many cities (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.03, 1.74), infrequently visiting hometown (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22, 1.99), poor Mandarin proficiency (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.13, 2.01), a low level of perceived benefits of migration (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14, 1.55) and working more than 8 h/day (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.14, 1.70).

conclusionsCMHPs are very prevalent among Chinese migrant workers. Given the large number of Chinese migrant workers, there is an urgent need to address the mental health burden of China's migrant worker population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsian PeopleChinaFemaleHumansMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedPopulation DynamicsPrevalenceRisk FactorsRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTransients and MigrantsChinacommon mental health problemepidemiologyrural-to-urban migrant worker

Identifiers

PMID28067189
PMCPMC6998856
OpenAlexW2569743559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.