Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Role for Egr1 in the Transcriptional Program Associated with Neuronal Differentiation of PC12 Cells.

Kenneth W Adams, Sergey Kletsov, Ryan J Lamm, Jessica S Elman, Steven Mullenbrock, Geoffrey M Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanistic regulation of SPHK1 expression and translocation by EMAP II in pulmonary smooth muscle cells.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth W AdamsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-2046
Sergey KletsovDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ryan J LammDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jessica S ElmanDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Steven MullenbrockDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Geoffrey M CooperDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Boston University · USBridgewater State University · US

Funding

Regulation of apoptosis by PI 3-kinase/Akt signalingR01CA018689 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI COOPER, GEOFFREY M · 1985 to 2012
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA018689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PC12 cells are a well-established model to study how differences in signal transduction duration can elicit distinct cell behaviors. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) activates transient ERK signaling in PC12 cells that lasts 30-60 min, which in turn promotes proliferation; nerve growth factor (NGF) activates more sustained ERK signaling that lasts 4-6 h, which in turns induces neuronal differentiation. Data presented here extend a previous study by Mullenbrock et al. (2011) that demonstrated that sustained ERK signaling in response to NGF induces preferential expression of a 69-member gene set compared to transient ERK signaling in response to EGF and that the transcription factors AP-1 and CREB play a major role in the preferential expression of several genes within the set. Here, we examined whether the Egr family of transcription factors also contributes to the preferential expression of the gene set in response to NGF. Our data demonstrate that NGF causes transient induction of all Egr family member transcripts, but a corresponding induction of protein was detected for only Egr1 and 2. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments provided clearest evidence that, after induction, Egr1 binds 12 of the 69 genes that are preferentially expressed during sustained ERK signaling. In addition, Egr1 expression and binding upstream of its target genes were both sustained in response to NGF versus EGF within the same timeframe that its targets are preferentially expressed. These data thus provide evidence that Egr1 contributes to the transcriptional program activated by sustained ERK signaling in response to NGF, specifically by contributing to the preferential expression of its target genes identified here.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationEarly Growth Response Protein 1Gene Expression RegulationNerve Growth FactorNeurogenesisNeuronsPC12 CellsRatsSignal TransductionTranscriptional ActivationEarly Growth Response Protein 1Egr1 protein, ratNerve Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID28076410
PMCPMC5226839
OpenAlexW2575315561

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.