Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28084563›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2017

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclophosphamide for Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis.

Lin-Bo Zhu, Lin-Lin Liu, Li Yao, Li-Ning Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03549663 (Random, Open, Control and Monocentric Clinical Research on Tacrolimus Monotherapy for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03549663 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Random, Open, Control and Monocentric Clinical Research on Tacrolimus Monotherapy for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (IMN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorXinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2018 to 2021Enrolled108ConditionsIdiopathic Membranous NephropathyArmsTacrolimus, Prednisone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin-Bo ZhuDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
Lin-Lin LiuDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. catherine-ll@126.com.
Li YaoDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
Li-Ning WangDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China.
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with cyclophosphamide in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) patients. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT). Any study that compared the efficacy or safety between tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide in the adult PMN patients was included.

resultsWe included four randomized controlled trials and two prospective cohort studies with 389 PMN patients. The pooled results using the Dersimonian and Laird method showed that renal remission rates at the longest follow-up periods were not significantly different between the tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide groups (overall remission, six trials, n = 389, relative risk [RR] 0.994 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.768-1.286); complete remission, six trials, n = 389, RR 1.256 [95% CI 0.733-2.150]). Further analyses found that tacrolimus was comparable with cyclophosphamide for inducing renal remission within 1 year but inferior to cyclophosphamide after 1-year follow-up. It should be noted that only two studies reported the outcomes after 1-year follow-up, which might be considered as weak evidence. The rates of relapse and the drop-outs due to adverse effects were not significantly different (relapse, six trials, n = 389, RR 2.244 [95% CI 0.892-5.644]; drop-outs, six trials, n = 389, RR 1.330 [95% CI 0.412-4.291]). However, the cyclophosphamide group had a significantly higher risk of leukopenia than the tacrolimus group (four trials, n = 216, RR 0.203 [95% CI 0.045-0.916]), whereas the rates of tremor were significantly higher in the tacrolimus group than in the cyclophosphamide group (three trials, n = 202, RR 8.939 [95% CI 1.694-47.173]). LIMITATIONS: The quality and short follow-up durations of the studies limited the reliability of our conclusions.

conclusionsTacrolimus was comparable with cyclophosphamide for inducing renal remission of PMN patients within 1 year, but the long-term effects need to be investigated. The cyclophosphamide group had a significantly higher risk of leukopenia, whereas the tacrolimus group had significantly higher rates of tremor. These conclusions need to be further verified.

Indexed as

CyclophosphamideGlomerulonephritis, MembranousHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimusCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID28084563
OpenAlexW2575038345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.