Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28086785›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Whole genome resequencing reveals diagnostic markers for investigating global migration and hybridization between minke whale species.

Ketil Malde, Bjørghild B Seliussen, María Quintela, Geir Dahle, Francois Besnier, Hans J Skaug, Nils Øien, Hiroko K Solvang, Tore Haug, Rasmus Skern-Mauritzen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ketil MaldeInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7381-1849
Bjørghild B SeliussenInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
María QuintelaInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Geir DahleInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Francois BesnierInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Hans J SkaugInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Nils ØienInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Hiroko K SolvangInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Tore HaugInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 6404, N-9294, Tromsø, Norway.
Rasmus Skern-MauritzenInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway.
Naohisa KandaInstitute of Cetacean Research, Toyomi-cho 4-5, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0055, Japan.
Luis A PasteneInstitute of Cetacean Research, Toyomi-cho 4-5, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0055, Japan.
Inge JonassenDepartment of Informatics, University of Bergen, N-5020, Bergen, Norway.
Kevin A GloverInstitute of Marine Research, PO box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817, Bergen, Norway. kevin.glover@imr.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the marine environment, where there are few absolute physical barriers, contemporary contact between previously isolated species can occur across great distances, and in some cases, may be inter-oceanic. An example of this can be seen in the minke whale species complex. Antarctic minke whales are genetically and morphologically distinct from the common minke found in the north Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and the two species are estimated to have been isolated from each other for 5 million years or more. Recent atypical migrations from the southern to the northern hemisphere have been documented and fertile hybrids and back-crossed individuals between both species have also been identified. However, it is not known whether this represents a contemporary event, potentially driven by ecosystem changes in the Antarctic, or a sporadic occurrence happening over an evolutionary time-scale. We successfully used whole genome resequencing to identify a panel of diagnostic SNPs which now enable us address this evolutionary question.

resultsA large number of SNPs displaying fixed or nearly fixed allele frequency differences among the minke whale species were identified from the sequence data. Five panels of putatively diagnostic markers were established on a genotyping platform for validation of allele frequencies; two panels (26 and 24 SNPs) separating the two species of minke whale, and three panels (22, 23, and 24 SNPs) differentiating the three subspecies of common minke whale. The panels were validated against a set of reference samples, demonstrating the ability to accurately identify back-crossed whales up to three generations.

conclusionsThis work has resulted in the development of a panel of novel diagnostic genetic markers to address inter-oceanic and global contact among the genetically isolated minke whale species and sub-species. These markers, including a globally relevant genetic reference data set for this species complex, are now openly available for researchers interested in identifying other potential whale hybrids in the world's oceans. The approach used here, combining whole genome resequencing and high-throughput genotyping, represents a universal approach to develop similar tools for other species and population complexes.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationGenetic MarkersGenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHybridization, GeneticAllelesAnimalsChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenotypeMinke WhalePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID28086785
PMCPMC5237217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.