Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28110823›Full record

SynthesisBiological psychiatry2017

Detecting Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Depression: A Meta-analysis of Multivariate Pattern Recognition Studies.

Joseph Kambeitz, Carlos Cabral, Matthew D Sacchet, Ian H Gotlib, Roland Zahn, Mauricio H Serpa, Martin Walter, Peter Falkai, Nikolaos Koutsouleris

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joseph KambeitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich. Electronic address: joseph.kambeitz@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Carlos CabralDepartment of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich.
Matthew D SacchetNeurosciences Program and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Ian H GotlibNeurosciences Program and Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Roland ZahnInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mauricio H SerpaLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Applied Neurosciences (NAPNA), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Martin WalterClinical Affective Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Behavioural Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany.
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich.
Nikolaos KoutsoulerisDepartment of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEStanford University · USKing's College London · GBUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Association Between Early Life Stress and Depression Across AdolescenceR37MH101495 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB · 2018 to 2026
$6.6M
Risk for Depression:Identifying and Altering Psychobiological MechanismsR01MH074849 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2006 to 2015
$6.2M
Reducing Rumination in Depression: Mechanisms and EffectsR21MH105785 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2015 to 2016
$441k
Medical Research Council G0902304NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074849NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH101495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have examined functional and structural brain alteration in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). The introduction of multivariate statistical methods allows investigators to utilize data concerning these brain alterations to generate diagnostic models that accurately differentiate patients with MDD from healthy control subjects (HCs). However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the reported results, the methodological approaches, and the clinical characteristics of participants in these studies.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of all studies using neuroimaging (volumetric measures derived from T1-weighted images, task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], resting-state MRI, or diffusion tensor imaging) in combination with multivariate statistical methods to differentiate patients diagnosed with MDD from HCs.

resultsThirty-three (k = 33) samples including 912 patients with MDD and 894 HCs were included in the meta-analysis. Across all studies, patients with MDD were separated from HCs with 77% sensitivity and 78% specificity. Classification based on resting-state MRI (85% sensitivity, 83% specificity) and on diffusion tensor imaging data (88% sensitivity, 92% specificity) outperformed classifications based on structural MRI (70% sensitivity, 71% specificity) and task-based functional MRI (74% sensitivity, 77% specificity).

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the high representational capacity of multivariate statistical methods to identify neuroimaging-based biomarkers of depression. Future studies are needed to elucidate whether multivariate neuroimaging analysis has the potential to generate clinically useful tools for the differential diagnosis of affective disorders and the prediction of both treatment response and functional outcome.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingBrainHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMultivariate AnalysisAffective disorderClassificationDiagnosisPredictionSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID28110823
PMCPMC11927514
OpenAlexW2555699120

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.