Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2017
Adherence to Newly Prescribed Diabetes Medications Among Insured Latino and White Patients With Diabetes.
Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Social Determinants of Health with Utilization of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Association between language discordance and unplanned hospital readmissions or emergency department revisits: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Pooled it
- A global systematic overview of socioeconomic factors associated with antidiabetic medication adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Twenty-year trends in racial and ethnic enrollment in large diabetes randomized controlled trials.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Collaborative Care for Depression among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Association of Baseline Factors With Glycemic Outcomes in GRADE: A Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.Diabetes care · 2024 · on this mapTrial
- Influence of Language and Physician-Patient Racial Concordance on Diabetes Control: An Analysis of Consultations in California Clinics.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Developing a Culturally Adapted Digital Health Application for Older Hispanic Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Qualitative and Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Impact of the Multidisciplinary Team on Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Article
- Discussing the Interplay of Social Determinants of Health, Aging, and Alzheimer's Biomarkers in U.S. Latinos.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Review
- Adapting a Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Diabetes Medication Adherence in a Spanish-Speaking Population: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Optimizing diabetes management interventions for Black and Hispanic adults using the multiphase optimization strategy: Protocol for a randomized mixed methods factorial trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Sex, ethnicity and language differences in statin prescribing in community health center patients.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Language, 6-mercaptopurine adherence, and relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Not obtaining a medication the first time it is prescribed: primary non-adherence to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Review
- Article
- Metabolic Syndrome, Modifiable Lifestyle Factors, and Sleep-Disordered Breathing: The Hispanic Community Health Study.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024Observational
- An Economic Evaluation of the Relationship Between Glycemic Control and Total Healthcare Costs for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Medication adherence is essential to diabetes care. Patient-physician language barriers may affect medication adherence among Latino individuals. Objective: To determine the association of patient race/ethnicity, preferred language, and physician language concordance with patient adherence to newly prescribed diabetes medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational study was conducted from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2012, at a large integrated health care delivery system with professional interpreter services. Insured patients with type 2 diabetes, including English-speaking white, English-speaking Latino, or limited English proficiency (LEP) Latino patients with newly prescribed diabetes medication. Exposures: Patient race/ethnicity, preferred language, and physician self-reported Spanish-language fluency. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary nonadherence (never dispensed), early-stage nonpersistence (dispensed only once), late-stage nonpersistence (received ≥2 dispensings, but discontinued within 24 months), and inadequate overall medication adherence (>20% time without sufficient medication supply during 24 months after initial prescription). Results: Participants included 21 878 white patients, 5755 English-speaking Latino patients, and 3205 LEP Latino patients with a total of 46 131 prescriptions for new diabetes medications. Among LEP Latino patients, 50.2% (n = 1610) had a primary care physician reporting high Spanish fluency. For oral medications, early adherence varied substantially: 1032 LEP Latino patients (32.2%), 1565 English-speaking Latino patients (27.2%), and 4004 white patients (18.3%) were either primary nonadherent or early nonpersistent. Inadequate overall adherence was observed in 1929 LEP Latino patients (60.2%), 2975 English-speaking Latino patients (51.7%), and 8204 white patients (37.5%). For insulin, early-stage nonpersistence was 42.8% among LEP Latino patients (n = 1372), 34.4% among English-speaking Latino patients (n = 1980), and 28.5% among white patients (n = 6235). After adjustment for patient and physician characteristics, LEP Latino patients were more likely to be nonadherent to oral medications and insulin than English-speaking Latino patients (relative risks from 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15] to 1.17 [95% CI, 1.02-1.34]; P < .05) or white patients (relative risks from 1.36 [95% CI, 1.31-1.41] to 1.49 [95% CI, 1.32-1.69]; P < .05). English-speaking Latino patients were more likely to be nonadherent compared with white patients (relative risks from 1.23 [95% CI, 1.19-1.27] to 1.30 [95% CI, 1.23-1.39]; P < .05). Patient-physician language concordance was not associated with rates of nonadherence among LEP Latinos (relative risks from 0.92 [95% CI, 0.71-1.19] to 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97-1.1]; P > .28). Conclusions and Relevance: Nonadherence to newly prescribed diabetes medications is substantially greater among Latino than white patients, even among English-speaking Latino patients. Limited English proficiency Latino patients are more likely to be nonadherent than English-speaking Latino patients independent of the Spanish-language fluency of their physicians. Interventions beyond access to interpreters or patient-physician language concordance will be required to improve medication adherence among Latino patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.