Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28116754›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2017

Randomised clinical trial: mucosal protection combined with acid suppression in the treatment of non-erosive reflux disease - efficacy of Esoxx, a hyaluronic acid-chondroitin sulphate based bioadhesive formulation.

V Savarino, F Pace, C Scarpignato, Esoxx Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. E-GastryalJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: What's new right now?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V SavarinoGastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
F PaceDivision of Gastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy, Bolognini Teaching Hospital, Milano, Italy.
C ScarpignatoClinical Pharmacology & Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-857X
Esoxx Study Group
Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have shown that patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) are less responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) than those with erosive disease as they belong to different subgroups, in whom factors other than acid can trigger symptoms.

aimTo evaluate whether combined therapy (mucosal protection plus acid suppression) would improve symptom relief compared to PPI treatment alone.

methodsIn a multicenter, randomised, double-blind trial, 154 patients with NERD were randomised to receive Esoxx (Alfa Wassermann, Bologna, Italy), a hyaluronic acid-chondroitin sulphate based bioadhesive formulation, or placebo, in addition to acid suppression with standard dose PPIs for 2 weeks. Symptoms (heartburn, acid regurgitation, retrosternal pain and acid taste in the mouth) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were evaluated before and after treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 3-point reduction in the total symptom score.

resultsAt the end of treatment, the primary endpoint was reached by 52.6% of patients taking Esoxx compared to 32.1% of those given placebo (P < 0.01). The same was true also for HRQL, evaluated by means of the Short Form-36 questionnaire, which improved with both treatments, but some items were significantly better after Esoxx plus PPI therapy.

conclusionThe synergistic effect of Essox with PPI treatment suggests that mucosal protection added to acid suppression could improve symptoms and HRQL in NERD patients.

Indexed as

AdultChondroitin SulfatesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHeartburnHumansHyaluronic AcidItalyMaleMiddle AgedProton Pump InhibitorsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeChondroitin SulfatesHyaluronic AcidProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28116754
PMCPMC5347926
OpenAlexW2582607892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.