Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28117672›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Reprogramming Methods Do Not Affect Gene Expression Profile of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Marta Trevisan, Giovanna Desole, Giulia Costanzi, Enrico Lavezzo, Giorgio Palù, Luisa Barzon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sonogenetics in the Treatment of Chronic Diseases: A New Method for Cell Regulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta TrevisanDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy. marta.trevisan@unipd.it.
Giovanna DesoleDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy. giovanna.desole@studenti.unipd.it.
Giulia CostanziDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy. giulia.costanzi.gc@gmail.com.
Enrico LavezzoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy. enrico.lavezzo@unipd.it.
Giorgio PalùDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy. giorgio.palu@unipd.it.
Luisa BarzonDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy. luisa.barzon@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are pluripotent cells derived from adult somatic cells. After the pioneering work by Yamanaka, who first generated iPSCs by retroviral transduction of four reprogramming factors, several alternative methods to obtain iPSCs have been developed in order to increase the yield and safety of the process. However, the question remains open on whether the different reprogramming methods can influence the pluripotency features of the derived lines. In this study, three different strategies, based on retroviral vectors, episomal vectors, and Sendai virus vectors, were applied to derive iPSCs from human fibroblasts. The reprogramming efficiency of the methods based on episomal and Sendai virus vectors was higher than that of the retroviral vector-based approach. All human iPSC clones derived with the different methods showed the typical features of pluripotent stem cells, including the expression of alkaline phosphatase and stemness maker genes, and could give rise to the three germ layer derivatives upon embryoid bodies assay. Microarray analysis confirmed the presence of typical stem cell gene expression profiles in all iPSC clones and did not identify any significant difference among reprogramming methods. In conclusion, the use of different reprogramming methods is equivalent and does not affect gene expression profile of the derived human iPSCs.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingCellular Reprogramming TechniquesFibroblastsGenetic VectorsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlasmidsPluripotent Stem CellsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reactionepisomal vectorgene expressioninduced pluripotent stem cellsreprogramming methodretroviral vectorSendai virus vector

Identifiers

PMID28117672
PMCPMC5297836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.