Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28118025›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2017

Interrater variability for CT angiography evaluation between neurologists and neuroradiologist in acute stroke patients.

Michal Bar, Jiri Kral, Tomas Jonszta, Vaclav Marcian, Martin Kuliha, Robert Mikulik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michal Bar1 Comprehensive Stroke Centre, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jiri Kral1 Comprehensive Stroke Centre, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tomas Jonszta4 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Vaclav Marcian1 Comprehensive Stroke Centre, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Martin Kuliha1 Comprehensive Stroke Centre, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Robert Mikulik3 Department of Neurology, St Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZUniversity of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe diagnosis of arterial occlusion has a considerable impact on the indication of mechanical thrombectomy, and CT angiography (CTA) is recommended in the management of acute stroke. The goal of the present study is to assess the interrater agreement in the diagnosis of occlusion of intracranial arteries on CTA between a neuroradiologist and neurologists.

methodsCTA images of 75 acute stroke patients were evaluated for occlusion of intracranial arteries by an experienced interventional neuroradiologist, and stroke and general neurologists.

results75 patients who were treated by intravenous thrombolysis were enrolled in the study. CTA images were available for all 75 patients (34 females; mean age ± SD, 72 ± 14 years; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 10; median 8-14; and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT mean 9.7). The agreement between the neuroradiologist and neurologists in evaluation of intracranial artery occlusion was as follows: occlusion of the middle cerebral artery segment M1: observer agreement 77%, kappa (κ) = 0.61 and middle cerebral artery M2: observer agreement 77%, κ 0.48; internal carotid artery: observer agreement 92%, κ 0.84; T occlusion: observer agreement 90.0%, κ 0.33; posterior cerebral artery segments P1 and P2: observer agreement 98%, κ 0.97; basilar artery: observer agreement 96%, κ 0.92; and vertebral artery segment V4: observer agreement 88%, κ 0.48.

conclusionInterrater agreement of CTA evaluation of occlusion between the neurologists and the neuroradiologist was very strong. The ability of the trained neurologists to read an intracranial large vessel occlusion correctly may improve the door-to-needle times in acute stroke. Advances in knowledge: In this study, the neurologists were able to recognize occlusion of intracranial arteries. This could accelerate the management of acute stroke care.

Indexed as

AgedBrainCerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleNeurologistsNeuroradiographyObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsStroke

Identifiers

PMID28118025
PMCPMC5601522
OpenAlexW2581574918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.