Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28151974›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Assessment of a prognostic model, PSA metrics and toxicities in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer using data from Project Data Sphere (PDS).

Bethany Pitcher, Leila Khoja, Robert J Hamilton, Kald Abdallah, Melania Pintilie, Anthony M Joshua

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethany PitcherDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leila KhojaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert J HamiltonDepartment of Urologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kald AbdallahProject Data Sphere LLC, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.
Melania PintilieDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anthony M JoshuaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic models in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) may have clinical utility. Using data from PDS, we aimed to 1) validate a contemporary prognostic model (Templeton et al., 2014) 2) evaluate prognostic impact of concomitant medications and PSA decrease 3) evaluate factors associated with docetaxel toxicity.

methodsWe accessed data on 2,449 mCRPC patients in PDS. The existing model was validated with a continuous risk score, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and corresponding time-dependent Area under the Curve (tAUC). The prognostic effects of concomitant medications and PSA response were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models. One year tAUC was calculated for multivariable prognostic model optimized to our data. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess associations with grade 3/4 adverse events (G3/4 AE) at baseline and after cycle 1 of treatment.

resultsDespite limitations of the PDS data set, the existing model was validated; one year AUC, was 0.68 (95% CI 95% CI, .66 to .71) to 0.78 (95%CI, .74 to .81) depending on the subset of datasets used. A new model was constructed with an AUC of .74 (.72 to .77). Concomitant medications low molecular weight heparin and warfarin were associated with poorer survival, Metformin and Cox2 inhibitors were associated with better outcome. PSA response was associated with survival, the effect of which was greatest early in follow-up. Age was associated with baseline risk of G3/4 AE. The odds of experiencing G3/4 AE later on in treatment were significantly greater for subjects who experienced a G3/4 AE in their first cycle (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.53-4.91, p < .0001).

conclusionDespite heterogeneous data collection protocols, PDS provides access to large datasets for novel outcomes analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate its utility for validating existing models and novel model generation including the utility of concomitant medications in outcome analyses, as well as the effect of PSA response on survival and toxicity prediction.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsArea Under CurveCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDisease ProgressionDocetaxelHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleMetforminModels, TheoreticalProportional Hazards ModelsProstate-Specific AntigenROC CurveTaxoidsAntineoplastic AgentsCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDocetaxelHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightMetforminProstate-Specific AntigenTaxoidsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID28151974
PMCPMC5289419

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.