Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28159846›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Standardised versus individualised multiherb Chinese herbal medicine for oligomenorrhoea and amenorrhoea in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomised feasibility and pilot study in the UK.

Lily Lai, Andrew Flower, Philip Prescott, Trevor Wing, Michael Moore, George Lewith

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The mechanism ofJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Reasonable Evaluation ofJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A comprehensive review of clinical studies with herbal medicine on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lily LaiUniversity of Southampton Primary Care and Population Sciences Aldermoor Health Centre Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6611-7234
Andrew FlowerUniversity of Southampton Primary Care and Population Sciences Aldermoor Health Centre Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.
Philip PrescottUniversity of Southampton, Mathematical Sciences Highfield Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Trevor WingBournemouth University Centre for Ultrasound Studies, Bournemouth, UK.
Michael MooreUniversity of Southampton Primary Care and Population Sciences Aldermoor Health Centre Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.
George LewithUniversity of Southampton Primary Care and Population Sciences Aldermoor Health Centre Aldermoor Close, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBBournemouth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore feasibility of a randomised study using standardised or individualised multiherb Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for oligomenorrhoea and amenorrhoea in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), to pilot study methods and to obtain clinical data to support sample size calculations.

designProspective, pragmatic, randomised feasibility and pilot study with participant and practitioner blinding.

setting2 private herbal practices in the UK.

participants40 women diagnosed with PCOS and oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea following Rotterdam criteria.

intervention6 months of either standardised CHM or individualised CHM, 16 g daily taken orally as a tea.

main outcome measuresOur primary objective was to determine whether oligomenorrhoea and amenorrhoea were appropriate as the primary outcome measures for the main study. Estimates of treatment effects were obtained for menstrual rate, body mass index (BMI), weight and hirsutism. Data were collected regarding safety, feasibility and acceptability.

resultsOf the 40 participants recruited, 29 (72.5%) completed the study. The most frequently cited symptoms of concern were hirsutism, weight and menstrual irregularity. Statistically significant improvements in menstrual rates were found at 6 months within group for both standardised CHM (mean difference (MD) 0.18±0.06, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.29; p=0.0027) and individualised CHM (MD 0.27±0.06, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.39; p<0.001), though not between group (p=0.26). No improvements were observed for BMI nor for weight in either group. Improvements in hirsutism scores found within group for both groups were not statistically significant between group (p=0.09). Liver and kidney function and adverse events data were largely normal. Participant feedback suggests changing to tablet administration could facilitate adherence.

conclusionsA CHM randomised controlled trial for PCOS is feasible and preliminary data suggest that both individualised and standardised multiherb CHMs have similar safety profiles and clinical effects on promoting menstrual regularity. These data will inform the design of a study in primary care that will incorporate an appropriate control. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 31072075; Results.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAmenorrheaBody Mass IndexBody WeightDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsDrugs, Chinese HerbalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHirsutismHumansMenstruationOligomenorrheaPatient SatisfactionPhytotherapyDrug CombinationsDrugs, Chinese HerbalChinese herbal medicineCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINEPolycystic Ovary SyndromePRIMARY CARETraditional Chinese Medicine

Identifiers

PMID28159846
PMCPMC5293993
OpenAlexW2583593387

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.