Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28183267›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

How can functional annotations be derived from profiles of phenotypic annotations?

Beatriz Serrano-Solano, Antonio Díaz Ramos, Jean-Karim Hériché, Juan A G Ranea

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Sharing and reusing cell image data.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beatriz Serrano-SolanoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Málaga, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, Málaga, 29071, Spain.
Antonio Díaz RamosDepartment of Algebra, Geometry and Topology, University of Málaga, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, Málaga, 29071, Spain.
Jean-Karim HérichéEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany.
Juan A G RaneaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Málaga, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, Málaga, 29071, Spain. ranea@uma.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss-of-function phenotypes are widely used to infer gene function using the principle that similar phenotypes are indicative of similar functions. However, converting phenotypic to functional annotations requires careful interpretation of phenotypic descriptions and assessment of phenotypic similarity. Understanding how functions and phenotypes are linked will be crucial for the development of methods for the automatic conversion of gene loss-of-function phenotypes to gene functional annotations.

resultsWe explored the relation between cellular phenotypes from RNAi-based screens in human cells and gene annotations of cellular functions as provided by the Gene Ontology (GO). Comparing different similarity measures, we found that information content-based measures of phenotypic similarity were the best at capturing gene functional similarity. However, phenotypic similarities did not map to the Gene Ontology organization of gene function but to functions defined as groups of GO terms with shared gene annotations.

conclusionsOur observations have implications for the use and interpretation of phenotypic similarities as a proxy for gene functions both in RNAi screen data analysis and curation and in the prediction of disease genes.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyHumansPhenotypeRNA InterferenceROC CurveBiological networkCellular phenotypeCluster analysisOntology

Identifiers

PMID28183267
PMCPMC5304448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.