Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205073›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.

Wael A AlJaroudi, Steven G Lloyd, Farooq A Chaudhry, Fadi G Hage

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2020 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  2. Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2018 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wael A AlJaroudiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Steven G LloydDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1900 University BLVD, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Farooq A ChaudhryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Fadi G HageDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1900 University BLVD, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. fadihage@uab.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes key imaging studies that were presented in the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2016 related to the fields of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and echocardiography. This bird's eye view will inform readers about multiple studies from these different modalities. We hope that this general overview will be useful for those that did not attend the conference as well as to those that did since it is often difficult to get exposure to many abstracts at large meetings. The review, therefore, aims to help readers stay updated on the newest imaging studies presented at the meeting.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMultimodal ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-ComputedUnited StatesEchocardiographymagnetic resonance imagingMIBG imagingmyocardial perfusion imaging: SPECTPET/CT imaging

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.