Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28213301›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Mental retirement and health selection: Analyses from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study.

Sean A P Clouston, Nicole Denier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. When I'm 64: Age-Related Variability in Over 40,000 Online Cognitive Test Takers.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cross-national Differences in the Association Between Retirement and Memory Decline.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean A P CloustonProgram in Public Health & Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. Electronic address: sean.clouston@stonybrookmedicine.edu.
Nicole DenierDepartment of Sociology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Sociology, Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA.
Colby College · USStony Brook Medicine · US

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Study Coordination and Measurement CoreP01AG043362 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HOFER, SCOTT M., KAYE, JEFFREY A · 2013 to 2017
$7.8M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG043362NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has recently suggested that retirement may decrease cognitive engagement, resulting in cognitive aging. Few studies have systematically documented whether or how selectivity into retirement shapes the relationship between retirement and cognitive aging.

methodsWe draw on data from the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2012) to examine the relationship between cognition and retirement for 18,575 labor force participants. Longitudinal regression discontinuity modeling was used to examine performance and decline in episodic memory. Models differentiated three forms of selection bias: indirect and direct selection as well as reverse causation. To further interrogate the disuse hypothesis, we adjust for confounding from health and socioeconomic sources.

resultsResults revealed that individuals who retired over the course of the panel were substantially different in terms of health, wealth and cognition when compared to those who remained employed. However, accounting for observed selection biases, significant associations were found linking longer retirement with more rapid cognitive decline. DISCUSSION: This study examined respondents who were in the labor force at baseline and transitioned into retirement. Analyses suggested that those who retired over the course of the panel had worse overall functioning, but also experienced more rapid declines after retirement that increased the rate of aging by two-fold, resulting in yearly losses of 3.7% (95% CI = [3.5, 4.0]) of one standard deviation in functioning attributable to retirement. Results are supportive of the view that retirement is associated with more rapid cognitive aging.

Indexed as

AgingCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetirementCognitive agingDisuseLongitudinal modelingMemoryMental retirementRegression discontinuityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28213301
PMCPMC5400287
OpenAlexW2582662467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.