Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28219375›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2017

State of the art in anti-cancer mAbs.

S M Chiavenna, J P Jaworski, A Vendrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Nanobodies: new avenue to treat kidney disease.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Anti-sortilin1 Antibody Up-Regulates ProgranulinFrontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S M ChiavennaFerrer Advanced Biotherapeutics, Ferrer Internacional, Barcelona, Spain. sebachiavenna@yahoo.com.ar.
J P JaworskiInstitute of Virology, CICVyA, INTA - CONICET, Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A VendrellFaculty of Medicine, CEFYBO - CONICET/University of Buenos Aires, C.A.B.A., Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following Milstein's discovery, the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) became a basic tool for biomedical science. In cancer field, since the first mAb was approved by the FDA a great improvement took place making of them a therapeutic option for many cancer types in the current clinical practice. Today, mAbs are being developed to target different molecules with different mechanisms of action and its target potential is unlimited. However, this huge and fast growing new field needs to be organized to better understand the treatment options we have to confront different cancer diseases. Current cancer targeted immunotherapies aim to achieve different goals like the regulation of osteoclast function, the delivery of cytotoxic drugs into tumor cells and the blockade of oncogenic pathways, neo-angiogenesis and immune checkpoints. Here, we reviewed the most relevant therapeutic mAbs for solid tumors available in current clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsOsteoclastsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeoplasmCancerCTLA-4EGFRHER2ImmunotherapyMonoclonal antibodyPD-1/PD-L1RANK/RANKLSolid tumorsVEGF/VEGFR

Identifiers

PMID28219375
PMCPMC5319201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.