Evidence mapPaperPMID 28233274Full record

GuidelineDrugs2017

The Safety of Appropriate Use of Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evidence-Based Review and Delphi Consensus.

David A Johnson, Philip O Katz, David Armstrong, Henry Cohen, Brendan C Delaney, Colin W Howden, Peter Katelaris, Radu I Tutuian, Donald O Castell

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. PPIs and Dementia: The Final Nail in the Coffin?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David A JohnsonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 885 Kempsville Rd, Suite 114, Norfolk, VA, 23505, USA. dajevms@aol.com.
Philip O KatzDivision of Gastroenterology, Einstein Medical Center, 5401 Old York Rd, Suite 363 Klein Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA. philipokatz@gmail.com.
David ArmstrongDivision of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, HSC-3V3, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Henry CohenDepartment of Gastroenterology, National University of Uruguay, Av. Italia 2370, 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Brendan C DelaneyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Colin W HowdenDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Avenue, Suite H210, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Peter KatelarisDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Sydney, Concord, Sydney, 2139, Australia.
Radu I TutuianDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Bern School of Medicine, Freiburgerstr 10, Bern, Switzerland.
Donald O CastellDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, 11 Harleston Place, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of over-the-counter (OTC) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the short-term (2 weeks) management of frequent heartburn (≥2 days/week) has increased markedly, yet evidence-based recommendations have not been developed. A panel of nine international experts in gastroesophageal reflux disease developed consensus statements regarding the risks and benefits of OTC PPIs using a modified Delphi process. Consensus (based on ≥80% approval) was reached through multiple rounds of remote voting and a final round of live voting. To identify relevant data, the available literature was searched and summarized. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system terminology was used to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations; consensus was based on ≥2/3 agreement. After 4 rounds of review, consensus was achieved for 18 statements. Notably, the available data did not directly reflect OTC use, but instead, prescription use; therefore, extrapolations to the OTC setting were often necessary. This limitation is regrettable, but it justifies performing this exercise to provide evidence-based expert opinion on a widely used class of drugs. The panel determined that using OTC PPIs according to label instructions is unlikely to mask the symptoms of esophageal or gastric cancer or adversely impact the natural history of related precursor conditions. OTC PPIs are not expected to substantially affect micronutrient absorption or bone mineral density or cause community-acquired pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, or cardiovascular adverse events. However, OTC PPI use may be associated with slightly increased risks for infectious diarrhea, certain idiosyncratic reactions, and cirrhosis-related spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The available evidence does not suggest that OTC PPI use consistent with label instructions is associated with substantial health risks. To minimize potential risks, healthcare professionals and consumers must actively participate in decision making when managing reflux-related symptoms in the self-care setting.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineGastroesophageal RefluxNonprescription DrugsProton Pump InhibitorsDelphi TechniqueHumansRisk AssessmentNonprescription DrugsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28233274
PMCPMC5357248

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.