Evidence mapPaperPMID 28262425Full record

ReviewTransplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.)2017

Sex differences in transplantation.

Jeremiah D Momper, Michael L Misel, Dianne B McKay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Kidney Health and Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy for Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recipient-Donor Sex Constellation in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An ELTR Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Gender and kidney transplantation.Frontiers in nephrology · 2024
    Review
  8. The impact of recipient and donor gender-match and mismatch on the post-liver transplant outcomes of patients with primary biliary cholangitis.Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Representation of Women in Contemporary Kidney Transplant Trials.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genophenotypic Factors and Pharmacogenomics in Adverse Drug Reactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeremiah D MomperSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego/La Jolla, CA.
Michael L MiselKidney Transplant/Department of Pharmacy Services, UC San Diego Health System, University of California, San Diego/La Jolla, CA.
Dianne B McKayDivision of Nephrology-Hypertension, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego/La Jolla, CA. Electronic address: d1mckay@ucsd.edu.

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex plays a role in the incidence and progression of a wide variety of diseases and conditions related to transplantation. Additionally, a growing body of clinical and experimental evidence suggests that sex can impact the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of several commonly used immunosuppressive and anti-infective drugs in transplant recipients. A better understanding of these sex differences will facilitate advances in individualizing treatment for patients and improve outcomes of solid organ transplantation. Here, we provide a review of sex-related differences in transplantation and highlight opportunities for future research directions.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationSex FactorsAnti-Infective AgentsFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleAnti-Infective AgentsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID28262425
PMCPMC5795092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.