SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017
Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06029712 (Developing a Heart Failure Polypill to Improve Outcomes at a Safety Net Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing a Heart Failure Polypill to Improve Outcomes at a Safety Net Hospital: A Pilot Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Female participation, and sex-specific reporting practices, in polypill randomized controlled trials in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of a systematic review.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- The Impact of Polypill on Adherence and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of evidence-based therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Association of polypill therapy with cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesPooled it
- Preventive Effects of a CVD Polypill on Developing Diabetes Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: Results of the PolyIran-Liver Trial.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Trial
- Effect of FIXed-dose combination of ARb and statin on adherence and risk factor control: The randomized FIXAR study.Cardiology journal · 2022Trial
- Quick buys for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular disease in the Americas: optimizing primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease series: cardiovascular disease in the Americas.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Levamlodipine Besylate in Smoking Patients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Observational
- Article
- Efficacy of different polypill combinations for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of Combination Antihypertensive Pills on Blood Pressure Control.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- The Economic Burden of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Italy.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Article
- May Measure Month 2022 in Italy: A Focus on Fixed-dose Combination, Therapeutic Adherence, and Medical Inertia in a Nationwide Survey.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
- Modular Titratable Polypills for Personalized Medicine and Simplification of Complex Medication Regimens.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Article
- [The polypill in cardiovascular prevention: successful through simplification? : New study results on the benefit of the polypill strategy in primary and secondary prevention].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Improved Persistence to Medication, Decreased Cardiovascular Events and Reduced All-Cause Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Use of Single-Pill Combinations: Results From the START-Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Article
- Frontiers of cardiovascular polypills: From atherosclerosis and beyond.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Fixed dose combination drugs for cardiovascular disease in a prolonged humanitarian crisis in Lebanon: an implementation study.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, yet ASCVD risk factor control and secondary prevention rates remain low. A fixed-dose combination of blood pressure- and cholesterol-lowering and antiplatelet treatments into a single pill, or polypill, has been proposed as one strategy to reduce the global burden of ASCVD.
objectivesTo determine the effect of fixed-dose combination therapy on all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal ASCVD events, and adverse events. We also sought to determine the effect of fixed-dose combination therapy on blood pressure, lipids, adherence, discontinuation rates, health-related quality of life, and costs. SEARCH
methodsWe updated our previous searches in September 2016 of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and DARE, HTA, and HEED. We also searched two clinical trials registers in September 2016. We used no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of a fixed-dose combination therapy including at least one blood pressure-lowering and one lipid-lowering component versus usual care, placebo, or an active drug comparator for any treatment duration in adults 18 years old or older, with no restrictions on presence or absence of pre-existing ASCVD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data for this update. We evaluated risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using fixed-effect models when heterogeneity was low (I MAIN
resultsIn the initial review, we identified nine randomised controlled trials with a total of 7047 participants and four additional trials (n = 2012 participants; mean age range 62 to 63 years; 30% to 37% women) were included in this update. Eight of the 13 trials evaluated the effects of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy in populations without prevalent ASCVD, and the median follow-up ranged from six weeks to 23 months. More recent trials were generally larger with longer follow-up and lower risk of bias. The main risk of bias was related to lack of blinding of participants and personnel, which was inherent to the intervention. Compared with the comparator groups (placebo, usual care, or active drug comparator), the effects of the fixed-dose combination treatment on mortality (FDC = 1.0% versus control = 1.0%, RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.89, I AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe effects of fixed-dose combination therapy on all-cause mortality or ASCVD events are uncertain. A limited number of trials reported these outcomes, and the included trials were primarily designed to observe changes in ASCVD risk factor levels rather than clinical events, which may partially explain the observed differences in risk factors that were not translated into differences in clinical outcomes among the included trials. Fixed-dose combination therapy is associated with modest increases in adverse events compared with placebo, active comparator, or usual care but may be associated with improved adherence to a multidrug regimen. Ongoing, longer-term trials of fixed-dose combination therapy will help demonstrate whether short-term changes in risk factors might be maintained and lead to expected differences in clinical events based on these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.