ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017
What Is the Role of Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation for Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia?
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of dilated cardiomyopathy successfully managing refractory electrical storm through sympathetic modulation.Journal of cardiology cases · 2025Article
- Contemporary management of ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2023Review
- Thoracoscopic sympathectomy decreases disease burden in patients with medically refractory ventricular arrhythmias.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Autonomic modulation of ventricular electrical activity: recent developments and clinical implications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2021Review
- Inhibition of N-type calcium channels in cardiac sympathetic neurons attenuates ventricular arrhythmogenesis in heart failure.Cardiovascular research · 2021Article
- Recent advances in the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.F1000Research · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThere is a subset of patients who have recurrent ventricular tachycardia despite optimal medical management with pharmacologic therapy and catheter ablation. The cardiac sympathetic nervous system is responsible for triggering and perpetuating ventricular arrhythmias, and surgery can reduce the sympathetic stimulation to the heart. Evidence supports the use of left cardiac sympathetic denervation in recurrent ventricular arrhythmias for long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. There are emerging studies suggesting an improvement in symptoms and survival for cardiac sympathetic denervation in a diverse range of underlying cardiac pathology. Some evidence supports that bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation may be more effective at preventing recurrent ventricular tachycardia compared to left sided alone. Despite recent studies demonstrating promising results, rigorous clinical trials demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of cardiac sympathetic denervation surgery are lacking. However, individuals with recurrent ventricular tachycardia have a poor prognosis and a low quality of life, and surgical treatment may be justified in some individuals. It is our opinion that for patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia, a multimodal approach should be used, including treatment of the underlying condition, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, pharmacologic therapy, and catheter ablation. If ventricular tachycardia persists after exhausting medical management, then cardiac sympathetic denervation may be considered. Future studies should focus on determining the impact of laterality on effectiveness and using novel imaging modalities to select patients most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.