Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28284191›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

A feasibility study with process evaluation of a preschool intervention to improve child and family lifestyle behaviours.

Lorraine McSweeney, Vera Araújo-Soares, Tim Rapley, Ashley Adamson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. From preschool to policy: A scoping review of recommended interventions for a systems approach to improve dietary intake in early childhood.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorraine McSweeneyInstitute of Health and Society and Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK. lorraine.mcsweeney@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1044-6201
Vera Araújo-SoaresInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle, NE2 4AX, UK.
Tim RapleyInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle, NE2 4AX, UK.
Ashley AdamsonInstitute of Health and Society and Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-001Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround a fifth of children starting school in England are now overweight/obese. There is a paucity of interventions with the aim of obesity prevention in preschool-age children in the UK. Previous research has demonstrated some positive results in changing specific health behaviours, however, positive trends in overall obesity rates are lacking. Preschool settings may provide valuable opportunities to access children and their families not only for promoting healthy lifestyles, but also to develop and evaluate behaviour-change interventions.

methodsThis paper presents a cluster randomised feasibility study of a theory based behaviour-change preschool practitioner-led intervention tested in four preschool centres in the North East of England. The primary outcome measures were to test the acceptability and feasibility of the data collection measures and intervention. Secondary measures were collected and reported for extra information. At baseline and post intervention, children's anthropometric, dietary and physical activity measures as well as family 'active' time data were collected. The preschool practitioner-led intervention included family intervention tasks such as 'family goal-setting activities' and 'cooking challenges'. Preschool activities included increasing physical activity and providing activities with the potential to change behaviour with increased knowledge of and acceptance of healthy eating. The process evaluation was an on-going monthly process and was collected in multiple forms such as questionnaires, photographs and verbal feedback.

results'Gatekeeper' permission and lower-hierarchal adherence were initially a problem for recruitment and methods acceptance. However, at intervention end the preschool teachers and parents stated they found most intervention methods and activities acceptable, and some positive changes in family health behaviours were reported. However, the preschool centres appeared to have difficulties with enforcing everyday school healthy eating policies.

conclusionsThe findings from the current study may have implications for nursery practitioners, nursery settings, Local Educational Authorities and policy makers, and contributes to the body of literature. However, further work with preschool practitioners is required to determine how personal attitudes and school policy application can be supported to implement successfully such an intervention.

trial registrationISRCTN12345678 (16/02/17) retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealthy LifestyleProcess Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesAnthropometryChildChild, PreschoolDiet SurveysEnglandExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleGoalsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansBehaviour changeFamilyFeasibility studyObesityPreschool

Identifiers

PMID28284191
PMCPMC5346247

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.