Evidence mapPaperPMID 28296201Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes investigation2018

Satisfaction of switching to combination therapy with lixisenatide and basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injection therapy: A randomized controlled trial.

Aika Miya, Akinobu Nakamura, Hideaki Miyoshi, Kyu Yong Cho, So Nagai, Yoshio Kurihara, Shin Aoki, Masataka Taguri, Yasuo Terauchi, Tatsuya Atsumi

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Simplification of Complex Insulin Regimens with IdegLira in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Literature Review and Clinical Recommendations.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aika MiyaDivision of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-6946
Akinobu NakamuraDivision of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-0006
Hideaki MiyoshiDivision of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Kyu Yong ChoDivision of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
So NagaiSapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshio KuriharaKurihara Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Shin AokiAoki Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Masataka TaguriDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuo TerauchiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Tatsuya AtsumiDivision of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPYokohama City University · JPAkebono Clinic · JPNTT Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionWe compared the satisfaction levels of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing combination therapy with lixisenatide (LIX) and basal insulin with that of patients undergoing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was a 12-week open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Participants were Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving MDI for >3 months. Patients were randomly assigned to each treatment cohort: (i) a group that continued MDI (MDI group); and (ii) a group that switched from MDI to combination therapy with LIX and basal insulin (LIX group). The primary outcome was change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores from baseline to 12 weeks between these two groups. Key secondary outcomes were glycated hemoglobin and body weight changes.

resultsA total of 31 patients were initially enrolled in the study, and 26 of them completed the study. The change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in the LIX group was significantly greater compared with that in the MDI group. Mean changes in glycated hemoglobin levels were -0.05 ± 0.37% in the MDI group and 0.04 ± 0.38% in the LIX group (P = 0.36). Mean changes in body weight were +0.6 ± 1.8 kg in the MDI group and -2.5 ± 1.8 kg in the LIX group (P < 0.01).

conclusionsSwitching from MDI to combination therapy with LIX and basal insulin improved satisfaction levels while maintaining glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like Peptide-2 ReceptorGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin GlargineMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like Peptide-2 ReceptorGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin GlarginelixisenatidePeptidesLixisenatideTreatment satisfactionType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28296201
PMCPMC5754530
OpenAlexW2593452599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.