ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017
Nonlinear mixed-effects model reveals a distinction between learning and performance in intensive reach training post-stroke.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of robot viscous forces on arm movements in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized crossover study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- The Efficiency, Efficacy, and Retention of Task Practice in Chronic Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2020Trial
- Dopamine replacement improves motor learning of an upper extremity task in people with Parkinson disease.Behavioural brain research · 2020Trial
- Boosting robot-assisted rehabilitation of stroke hemiparesis by individualized selection of upper limb movements - a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Trial
- Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Trial
- Effects of monoaminergic drugs on training-induced motor cortex plasticity in older adults.Brain research · 2017Trial
- Article
- Novel evaluation of upper-limb motor performance after stroke based on normal reaching movement model.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- How Common Is the Exponential Decay Pattern of Motor Skill Acquisition? A Brief Investigation.Motor control · 2021Article
- Predicting motor skill learning in older adults using visuospatial performance.Journal of motor learning and development · 2020Article
- Effect of Contextual Interference in the Practicing of a Computer Task in Individuals Poststroke.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Locomotor skill acquisition in virtual reality shows sustained transfer to the real world.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Visuospatial function predicts one-week motor skill retention in cognitively intact older adults.Neuroscience letters · 2018Article
- Measuring Habitual Arm Use Post-stroke With a Bilateral Time-Constrained Reaching Task.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe recently showed that individuals with chronic stroke who completed two sessions of intensive unassisted arm reach training exhibited improvements in movement times up to one month post-training. Here, we study whether changes in movement times during training can predict long-term changes.
methodsSixteen participants with chronic stroke and ten non-disabled age-matched participants performed two sessions of reach training with 600 movements per session. Movement time data during training were fitted to a nonlinear mixed-effects model consisting of a decreasing exponential term to model improvements of performance due to learning and an increasing linear term to model worsening of performance due to activity-dependent fatigability and/or other factors unrelated to learning.
resultsFor non-disabled age-matched participants, movement times gradually decreased overall during training and overall changes in movement times during training predicted long-term changes. In contrast, for participants post-stroke, movement times often worsened near the end of training. As a result, overall changes in movement times during training did not predict long-term changes in movement times in the stroke group. However, improvements in movement times due to training, as estimated by the exponential term of the model, predicted long-term changes in movement times.
conclusionParticipants post-stroke showed a distinction between learning and performance in unassisted intensive arm reach training. Despite worsening of performance in later trials, extended training was beneficial for long-term gains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.