Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28302928›Full record

ReviewCell structure and function2017

PI5P and PI(3,5)P

Junya Hasegawa, Bethany S Strunk, Lois S Weisman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell structure and function, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PI(3,5)PScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A PI(3,5)PNature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Noncanonical PI(4,5)PScience advances · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PtdIns(3,5)PNature · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. PtdIns(3,5)PbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Architecture of the human KICSTOR and GATOR1-KICSTOR complexes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Phosphatidic acid production on the vacuole harboringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Exosome: an overview on enhanced biogenesis by small molecules.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junya HasegawaLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan.
Bethany S StrunkLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan.
Lois S WeismanLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan.

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF ORGANELLE DIVISION AND SEGREGATIONR01GM050403 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEISMAN, LOIS S · 1994 to 2015
$5.7M
Roles and regulation of PI(3,5)P2 and PI5P in neuronsR01NS064015 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEISMAN, LOIS S · 2009 to 2018
$3.8M
Lipid phosphatases as dynamic regulators of protein conformationK99GM120511 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STRUNK, BETHANY S · 2016 to 2017
$178k
NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM120511NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050403NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most eukaryotes, phosphoinositides (PIs) have crucial roles in multiple cellular functions. Although the cellular levels of phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate (PI5P) and phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate (PI(3,5)P

Indexed as

AnimalsDiseaseHumansIntracellular SpaceOxidative StressPhosphatidylinositol Phosphatesphosphatidylinositol 3,5-diphosphatephosphatidylinositol 5-phosphatePhosphatidylinositol PhosphatesEndocytosisFab1/PIKfyveMembrane traffickingPhosphoinositidesVacuoles/Lysosomes

Identifiers

PMID28302928
PMCPMC5846621

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.