Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28303379›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2017

Statin therapy improves survival in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension: a propensity score matching study.

Luise Holzhauser, Ninel Hovnanians, Parham Eshtehardi, M Khalid Mojadidi, Yi Deng, David Goodman-Meza, Pavlos Msaouel, Yi-An Ko, Ronald Zolty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Are statins beneficial for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension?Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luise HolzhauserDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Ninel HovnaniansDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Parham EshtehardiDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-1787
M Khalid MojadidiDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Yi DengDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David Goodman-MezaDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Pavlos MsaouelDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Yi-An KoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ronald ZoltyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. ronald.zolty@unmc.edu.
Jacobi Medical Center · USEmory University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation is an increasingly recognized hallmark of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Statins have been shown to attenuate key pathologic mechanisms via pleiotropic effects in animal models. However, clinical benefit of statins in patients with PH is unknown and their effect on mortality has not been studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients between January 2002 to January 2012, with severe PH (pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥60 mmHg) and preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥50%), defined by transthoracic echocardiograms. Patients were divided into two groups based on statin therapy for 12 consecutive months after diagnosis of PH. Propensity score matching was performed. Subgroup analysis was done based on COPD status. Study endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality and hospitalization. 2363 patients (age 71 ± 16; 31% male) were included; 140 (6%) were on statin therapy. Overall 1-year mortality was 34%. Following propensity score matching, 138 patients were included in the statin group and 624 patients in the no-statin group; all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the statin group compared with the no-statin group [15.2 vs. 33.8%, HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.27, 0.66), p < 0.001], but hospitalization was comparable between two groups. After stratifying patients based on COPD status, patients with COPD showed a marginally significant survival benefit from statins [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.26, 1.10), p = 0.09]; and statins significantly reduced 1-year all-cause mortality in patients without COPD [HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.19, 0.67), p = 0.001]. We found no significant difference in the effect of statins on patients with COPD compared to those without (p = 0.16). Statin therapy is associated with reduced mortality risk in patients with severe PH and preserved left ventricular function. This beneficial effect was not found to be dependent on COPD status. These novel findings should be confirmed in large randomized trials.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAgedCause of DeathEchocardiography, DopplerFemaleHeart VentriclesHospitalizationHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypertension, PulmonaryMaleNew York CityPulmonary Wedge PressureRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival RateHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMortalityPulmonary hypertensionStatin

Identifiers

PMID28303379
OpenAlexW2596738298

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.