Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28322934›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental and comparative immunology2017

Comparative immunogenomics of molluscs.

Jonathan H Schultz, Coen M Adema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental and comparative immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Structural Analysis of Host-Parasite Interactions inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Immune diversity in lophotrochozoans, with a focus on recognition and effector systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Examining adaptive evolution of immune activity: opportunities provided by gastropods in the age of 'omics'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. From the raw bar to the bench: Bivalves as models for human health.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan H SchultzCenter for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Coen M AdemaCenter for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: coenadem@unm.edu.
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30GM110907 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI LOKER, ERIC SAMUEL · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative immunology, studying both vertebrates and invertebrates, provided the earliest descriptions of phagocytosis as a general immune mechanism. However, the large scale of animal diversity challenges all-inclusive investigations and the field of immunology has developed by mostly emphasizing study of a few vertebrate species. In addressing the lack of comprehensive understanding of animal immunity, especially that of invertebrates, comparative immunology helps toward management of invertebrates that are food sources, agricultural pests, pathogens, or transmit diseases, and helps interpret the evolution of animal immunity. Initial studies showed that the Mollusca (second largest animal phylum), and invertebrates in general, possess innate defenses but lack the lymphocytic immune system that characterizes vertebrate immunology. Recognizing the reality of both common and taxon-specific immune features, and applying up-to-date cell and molecular research capabilities, in-depth studies of a select number of bivalve and gastropod species continue to reveal novel aspects of molluscan immunity. The genomics era heralded a new stage of comparative immunology; large-scale efforts yielded an initial set of full molluscan genome sequences that is available for analyses of full complements of immune genes and regulatory sequences. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), due to lower cost and effort required, allows individual researchers to generate large sequence datasets for growing numbers of molluscs. RNAseq provides expression profiles that enable discovery of immune genes and genome sequences reveal distribution and diversity of immune factors across molluscan phylogeny. Although computational de novo sequence assembly will benefit from continued development and automated annotation may require some experimental validation, NGS is a powerful tool for comparative immunology, especially increasing coverage of the extensive molluscan diversity. To date, immunogenomics revealed new levels of complexity of molluscan defense by indicating sequence heterogeneity in individual snails and bivalves, and members of expanded immune gene families are expressed differentially to generate pathogen-specific defense responses.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateImmunogeneticsPhysiology, ComparativeAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolluscaPhagocytosisPhylogenyBivalviaGastropodaGenome characterizationNext-generation sequencingTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID28322934
PMCPMC5494275
OpenAlexW2596991628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.