ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
A generalized association test based on U statistics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-marker testing based on accelerated failure time models under possible left truncation and competing risks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A maximum kernel-based association test to detect the pleiotropic genetic effects on multiple phenotypes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- An optimal kernel-based multivariate U-statistic to test for associations with multiple phenotypes.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Multi-marker genetic association and interaction tests with interval-censored survival outcomes.Genetic epidemiology · 2021Article
- Unpaired data empowers association tests.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Set-based genetic association and interaction tests for survival outcomes based on weighted V statistics.Genetic epidemiology · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Gene-Based Multi-Trait Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- A multi-locus predictiveness curve and its summary assessment for genetic risk prediction.Statistical methods in medical research · 2020Article
- Exome-wide rare variant analyses of two bone mineral density phenotypes: the challenges of analyzing rare genetic variation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSecond generation sequencing technologies are being increasingly used for genetic association studies, where the main research interest is to identify sets of genetic variants that contribute to various phenotypes. The phenotype can be univariate disease status, multivariate responses and even high-dimensional outcomes. Considering the genotype and phenotype as two complex objects, this also poses a general statistical problem of testing association between complex objects.
resultsWe here proposed a similarity-based test, generalized similarity U (GSU), that can test the association between complex objects. We first studied the theoretical properties of the test in a general setting and then focused on the application of the test to sequencing association studies. Based on theoretical analysis, we proposed to use Laplacian Kernel-based similarity for GSU to boost power and enhance robustness. Through simulation, we found that GSU did have advantages over existing methods in terms of power and robustness. We further performed a whole genome sequencing (WGS) scan for Alzherimer's disease neuroimaging initiative data, identifying three genes, APOE , APOC1 and TOMM40 , associated with imaging phenotype. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We developed a C ++ package for analysis of WGS data using GSU. The source codes can be downloaded at https://github.com/changshuaiwei/gsu . CONTACT: weichangshuai@gmail.com ; qlu@epi.msu.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.