Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334167›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Identification of genetic outliers due to sub-structure and cryptic relationships.

Daniel Schlauch, Heide Fier, Christoph Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel SchlauchDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Heide FierDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Christoph LangeDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Systems Biology of Airway DiseaseP01HL132825 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WEISS, SCOTT T · 2016 to 2020
$12.6M
Novel Statistical Approaches to Mental Health Phenotype Analysis in GWA StudiesR01MH081862 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LANGE, CHRISTOPH · 2009 to 2014
$2.0M
A New Approach to Mental Health Phenotypes in Family Genomewide AssociationR01MH087590 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LANGE, CHRISTOPH · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
Preparing Association Analysis Software Tools for Next Generation Sequencing DataR01HG008976 · NHGRI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LANGE, CHRISTOPH · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008976NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL132825NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081862NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn order to minimize the effects of genetic confounding on the analysis of high-throughput genetic association studies, e.g. (whole-genome) sequencing (WGS) studies, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), etc., we propose a general framework to assess and to test formally for genetic heterogeneity among study subjects. As the approach fully utilizes the recent ancestor information captured by rare variants, it is especially powerful in WGS studies. Even for relatively moderate sample sizes, the proposed testing framework is able to identify study subjects that are genetically too similar, e.g. cryptic relationships, or that are genetically too different, e.g. population substructure. The approach is computationally fast, enabling the application to whole-genome sequencing data, and straightforward to implement.

resultsSimulation studies illustrate the overall performance of our approach. In an application to the 1000 Genomes Project, we outline an analysis/cleaning pipeline that utilizes our approach to formally assess whether study subjects are related and whether population substructure is present. In the analysis of the 1000 Genomes Project data, our approach revealed subjects that are most likely related, but had previously passed standard qc-filters. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation of our method, Similarity Test for Estimating Genetic Outliers (STEGO), is available in the R package stego from Github at https://github.com/dschlauch/stego . CONTACT: dschlauch@fas.harvard.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanSoftwareGenetic Association StudiesGenetics, PopulationHumansWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28334167
PMCPMC5870703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.