Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28335739›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Identification of long non-coding transcripts with feature selection: a comparative study.

Giovanna M M Ventola, Teresa M R Noviello, Salvatore D'Aniello, Antonietta Spagnuolo, Michele Ceccarelli, Luigi Cerulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. LncRNAs in vascular biology and disease.Vascular pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giovanna M M VentolaDepartment of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, via Port'Arsa, 11, Benevento, 82100, Italy.
Teresa M R NovielloDepartment of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, via Port'Arsa, 11, Benevento, 82100, Italy.
Salvatore D'AnielloBiology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, Napoli, 80121, Italy.
Antonietta SpagnuoloBiology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, Napoli, 80121, Italy.
Michele CeccarelliDepartment of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, via Port'Arsa, 11, Benevento, 82100, Italy.
Luigi CeruloDepartment of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, via Port'Arsa, 11, Benevento, 82100, Italy. lcerulo@unisannio.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8342-3487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unveiling of long non-coding RNAs as important gene regulators in many biological contexts has increased the demand for efficient and robust computational methods to identify novel long non-coding RNAs from transcripts assembled with high throughput RNA-seq data. Several classes of sequence-based features have been proposed to distinguish between coding and non-coding transcripts. Among them, open reading frame, conservation scores, nucleotide arrangements, and RNA secondary structure have been used with success in literature to recognize intergenic long non-coding RNAs, a particular subclass of non-coding RNAs.

resultsIn this paper we perform a systematic assessment of a wide collection of features extracted from sequence data. We use most of the features proposed in the literature, and we include, as a novel set of features, the occurrence of repeats contained in transposable elements. The aim is to detect signatures (groups of features) able to distinguish long non-coding transcripts from other classes, both protein-coding and non-coding. We evaluate different feature selection algorithms, test for signature stability, and evaluate the prediction ability of a signature with a machine learning algorithm. The study reveals different signatures in human, mouse, and zebrafish, highlighting that some features are shared among species, while others tend to be species-specific. Compared to coding potential tools and similar supervised approaches, including novel signatures, such as those identified here, in a machine learning algorithm improves the prediction performance, in terms of area under precision and recall curve, by 1 to 24%, depending on the species and on the signature.

conclusionsUnderstanding which features are best suited for the prediction of long non-coding RNAs allows for the development of more effective automatic annotation pipelines especially relevant for poorly annotated genomes, such as zebrafish. We provide a web tool that recognizes novel long non-coding RNAs with the obtained signatures from fasta and gtf formats. The tool is available at the following url: http://www.bioinformatics-sannio.org/software/ .

Indexed as

HumansProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingClassificationFeature selectionlncRNA

Identifiers

PMID28335739
PMCPMC5364679

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.