Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2017
Reduction of postprandial glucose by lixisenatide vs sitagliptin treatment in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes on background insulin glargine: A randomized phase IV study (NEXTAGE Study).
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02200991 (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, 28 Days Phase IV Study Comparing The Postprandial Plasma Glucose Profile of Lixisenatide With That of Sitagliptin Add-On to Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, 28 Days Phase IV Study Comparing The Postprandial Plasma Glucose Profile of Lixisenatide With That of Sitagliptin Add-On to Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- GLP-1RAs caused gastrointestinal adverse reactions of drug withdrawal: a system review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Reduction of postprandial glucose by lixisenatide vs sitagliptin treatment in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes on background insulin glargine: A randomized phase IV study (NEXTAGE Study).Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2017Trial
- Gastric Sensory and Motor Functions and Energy Intake in Health and Obesity-Therapeutic Implications.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Combination Therapy with Basal Insulin and Either Lixisenatide or Vildagliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018Article
- Evolving Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the pharmacodynamics of lixisenatide once daily vs sitagliptin once daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin glargine U100. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis multicentre, open-label, phase IV study (NEXTAGE Study; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02200991) randomly assigned 136 patients to either lixisenatide once daily via subcutaneous injection (10 µg initially increased weekly by 5 up to 20 µg) or once-daily oral sitagliptin 50 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in postprandial glucose (PPG) exposure 4 hours after a standardized breakfast (PPG area under the plasma glucose concentration-time curve [AUC
resultsLixisenatide reduced PPG exposure to a statistically significantly greater extent than sitagliptin: least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in PPG AUC
conclusionLixisenatide reduced PPG significantly more than sitagliptin, when these agents were added to basal insulin glargine U100, and was well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.