Evidence mapPaperPMID 28359332Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2017

The quality of health services provided to remote dwelling aboriginal infants in the top end of northern Australia following health system changes: a qualitative analysis.

Cathryn M Josif, Sue Kruske, Sue V Kildea, Lesley M Barclay

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cathryn M JosifUniversity Centre for Rural Health Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2480, Australia. djosif6@bigpond.com.
Sue KruskeSchool of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, 4010, Australia.
Sue V KildeaSchool of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, 4010, Australia.
Lesley M BarclayUniversity Centre for Rural Health Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2480, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia the health outcomes of remote dwelling Aboriginal infants are comparable to infants in developing countries. This research investigates service quality, from the clinicians' perspective and as observed and recorded by the researcher, in two large Aboriginal communities in the Top End of northern Australia following health system changes.

methodsData were collected from semi-structured interviews with 25 clinicians providing or managing child health services in the two study sites. Thirty hours of participant observation was undertaken in the 'baby-rooms' at the two remote health centres between June and December 2012. The interview and observational data, as well as field notes were integrated and analysed thematically to explore clinicians' perspectives of service delivery to infants in the remote health centres.

resultsA range of factors affecting the quality of care, mostly identified before health system changes were instigated, persisted. These factors included ineffective service delivery, inadequate staffing and culturally unsafe practices. The six themes identified in the data: 'very adhoc', 'swallowed by acute', 'going under', 'a flux', 'a huge barrier' and 'them and us' illustrate how these factors continue, and when combined portray a 'very chaotic system'.

conclusionService providers perceived service provision and quality to be inadequate, despite health system changes. Further work is urgently needed to improve the quality, cultural responsiveness and effectiveness of services to this population.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleNorthern TerritoryQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesRural Health ServicesAboriginalAnaemiaAustraliaChild HealthGrowth falteringIndigenousInfantRemote

Identifiers

PMID28359332
PMCPMC5374585
OpenAlexW2602159564

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.