Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28380045›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Haste makes waste: Decision making in patients with restless legs syndrome with and without augmentation.

Beatrice Heim, Marie-Theres Pertl, Ambra Stefani, Margarete Delazer, Anna Heidbreder, Laura Zamarian, Elisabeth Brandauer, Klaus Seppi, Birgit Högl, Werner Poewe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Beatrice HeimDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Marie-Theres PertlDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Ambra StefaniDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Margarete DelazerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Anna HeidbrederDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Laura ZamarianDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Elisabeth BrandauerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Klaus SeppiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Birgit HöglDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Werner PoeweDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Atbin DjamshidianDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate decision making in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) with and without augmentation treated with dopaminergic medication.

methodsA total of 64 non-demented RLS patients treated with dopaminergic medication with and without augmentation were included in this study. We used an information sampling task to assess how much evidence participants gather before making a decision. Performance was compared to the results of 21 healthy controls.

resultsAll patients with and without augmentation gathered less information than healthy controls before making a decision (p<0.001), but there was no difference between the two patient groups (p = 1.0). Furthermore, both patient groups made more irrational decisions (e.g. decisions against the evidence they had at the time) than healthy controls (p≤0.002). In addition, RLS patients with augmentation made significantly more irrational decisions than RLS patients without augmentation (p = 0.037) and controls (p<0.001).

conclusionsOur results show that RLS patients treated with dopaminergic drugs, regardless of having augmentation or not, jumped to conclusions and decided significantly more often against the evidence they had at the time of their decision. However, those with augmentation performed worse than all other groups and made more often irrational decisions, a phenomenon which is also common in patients with substance abuse or behavioural addictions. Thus, jumping to conclusions and deciding with a higher degree of uncertainty as well as irrational decision making is more common in RLS patients treated with dopaminergic medication particularly in those with augmentation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingCase-Control StudiesDopamine AgentsFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedRestless Legs SyndromeDopamine Agents

Identifiers

PMID28380045
PMCPMC5381880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.