Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403232›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

An oil containing EPA and DHA from transgenic Camelina sativa to replace marine fish oil in feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): Effects on intestinal transcriptome, histology, tissue fatty acid profiles and plasma biochemistry.

Mónica B Betancor, Keshuai Li, Matthew Sprague, Tora Bardal, Olga Sayanova, Sarah Usher, Lihua Han, Kjell Måsøval, Ole Torrissen, Johnathan A Napier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oil from transgenicAquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nutritional enhancement in plants - green and greener.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Hybridization rate and hybrid fitness forEvolutionary applications · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mónica B BetancorInstitute of Aquaculture, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Keshuai LiNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Biology, Trondheim, Norway.
Matthew SpragueInstitute of Aquaculture, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Tora BardalNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Biology, Trondheim, Norway.
Olga SayanovaDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Sarah UsherDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Lihua HanDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Kjell MåsøvalBiomar AS, Trondheim, Norway.
Ole TorrissenInstitute of Marine Research, Matre, Matredal, Norway.
Johnathan A NapierDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Douglas R TocherInstitute of Aquaculture, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Rolf Erik OlsenNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Biology, Trondheim, Norway.
Rothamsted Research · GBNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Stirling · GBBioMar (Norway) · NONorwegian Institute of Marine Research · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New de novo sources of omega 3 (n-3) long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) are required as alternatives to fish oil in aquafeeds in order to maintain adequate levels of the beneficial fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic (EPA and DHA, respectively). The present study investigated the use of an EPA+DHA oil derived from transgenic Camelina sativa in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) feeds containing low levels of fishmeal (35%) and fish oil (10%), reflecting current commercial formulations, to determine the impacts on tissue fatty acid profile, intestinal transcriptome, and health of farmed salmon. Post-smolt Atlantic salmon were fed for 12-weeks with one of three experimental diets containing either a blend of fish oil/rapeseed oil (FO), wild-type camelina oil (WCO) or transgenic camelina oil (DCO) as added lipid source. The DCO diet did not affect any of the fish performance or health parameters studied. Analyses of the mid and hindgut transcriptomes showed only mild effects on metabolism. Flesh of fish fed the DCO diet accumulated almost double the amount of n-3 LC-PUFA than fish fed the FO or WCO diets, indicating that these oils from transgenic oilseeds offer the opportunity to increase the n-3 LC-PUFA in farmed fish to levels comparable to those found a decade ago.

Indexed as

Animal FeedTranscriptomeAnimalsBrassicaceaeDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFisheriesFish OilsFish ProteinsGoblet CellsIntestinal MucosaIntestinesLipid MetabolismPlant OilsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSalmo salarDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFish OilsFish ProteinsPlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID28403232
PMCPMC5389825
OpenAlexW2607337153

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.