Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2017
Frequency of Evidence-Based Screening for Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)
Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC)
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2024Guideline
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022Guideline
- Integration of genomics and transcriptomics predicts diabetic retinopathy susceptibility genes.eLife · 2020Pooled it
- Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.Diabetes care · 2018Guideline
- Optimal Frequency of Urinary Albumin Screening in Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2022Trial
- Beyond hyperglycaemia: diabetic retinopathy is a multifactorial complication of diabetes mellitus.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- A prospective study for validating an automated AI-based system for detecting age-related macular degeneration in clinical settings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Long-term incidence and progression of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Asian populations.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- The Burden of Delayed Diabetic Retinopathy Management and Use of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Screening Tools: A Systematic Literature Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- The Association of Central Corneal Thickness and Central Corneal Epithelial Thickness with Anthropometric and Biochemical Parameters in Subjects with Impaired Glucose Metabolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2025Article
- The NIDDK Takes on the Complications of Type 1 Diabetes: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- To Determine the Risk-Based Screening Interval for Diabetic Retinopathy: Development and Validation of Risk Algorithm from a Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2025Article
- Predicting diabetic retinopathy stages using a simple nerve conduction measuring device, DPNCheckFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Article
- 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes care · 2024Review
- 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes care · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn patients who have had type 1 diabetes for 5 years, current recommendations regarding screening for diabetic retinopathy include annual dilated retinal examinations to detect proliferative retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema, both of which require timely intervention to preserve vision. During 30 years of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its longitudinal follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, retinal photography was performed at intervals of 6 months to 4 years.
methodsWe used retinal photographs from the DCCT/EDIC study to develop a rational screening frequency for retinopathy. Markov modeling was used to determine the likelihood of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema in patients with various initial retinopathy levels (no retinopathy or mild, moderate, or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy). The models included recognized risk factors for progression of retinopathy.
resultsOverall, the probability of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was limited to approximately 5% between retinal screening examinations at 4 years among patients who had no retinopathy, 3 years among those with mild retinopathy, 6 months among those with moderate retinopathy, and 3 months among those with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. The risk of progression was also closely related to mean glycated hemoglobin levels. The risk of progression from no retinopathy to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was 1.0% over 5 years among patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6%, as compared with 4.3% over 3 years among patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 10%. Over a 20-year period, the frequency of eye examinations was 58% lower with our practical, evidence-based schedule than with routine annual examinations, which resulted in substantial cost savings.
conclusionsOur model for establishing an individualized schedule for retinopathy screening on the basis of the patient's current state of retinopathy and glycated hemoglobin level reduced the frequency of eye examinations without delaying the diagnosis of clinically significant disease. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; DCCT/EDIC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00360893 and NCT00360815 .).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.