Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28423305›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2017

Frequency of Evidence-Based Screening for Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetes.

DCCT/EDIC Research Group, David M Nathan, Ionut Bebu, Dean Hainsworth, Ronald Klein, William Tamborlane, Gayle Lorenzi, Rose Gubitosi-Klug, John M Lachin

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00360815 nacompletednot on this map

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Ran1983 to 1993Enrolled1,441ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsInsulin
NCT00360893 active not recruitingnot on this map

Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC)

TypeobservationalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan1994 to 2027Enrolled1,441ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

DCCT/EDIC Research Group
David M NathanMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
Ionut BebuBiostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD
Dean HainsworthDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri, Columbia
Ronald KleinUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison
William TamborlaneYale Medical School, New Haven, CT
Gayle LorenziUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego
Rose Gubitosi-KlugCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland
John M LachinBiostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD
Harvard University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Limited Competition for the Continuation of Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Clinical Research Center (Collaborative U01)U01DK094157 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Ionut Bebu, Barbara Halina Braffett · 2011 to 2026
$97.6M
SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI ROHIT N. KULKARNI · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sakeneh Zraika · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Data Coordinating CenterU01DK094176 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BEBU, IONUT, BRAFFETT, BARBARA HALINA · 2012 to 2022
$30.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094157NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients who have had type 1 diabetes for 5 years, current recommendations regarding screening for diabetic retinopathy include annual dilated retinal examinations to detect proliferative retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema, both of which require timely intervention to preserve vision. During 30 years of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its longitudinal follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, retinal photography was performed at intervals of 6 months to 4 years.

methodsWe used retinal photographs from the DCCT/EDIC study to develop a rational screening frequency for retinopathy. Markov modeling was used to determine the likelihood of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema in patients with various initial retinopathy levels (no retinopathy or mild, moderate, or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy). The models included recognized risk factors for progression of retinopathy.

resultsOverall, the probability of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was limited to approximately 5% between retinal screening examinations at 4 years among patients who had no retinopathy, 3 years among those with mild retinopathy, 6 months among those with moderate retinopathy, and 3 months among those with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. The risk of progression was also closely related to mean glycated hemoglobin levels. The risk of progression from no retinopathy to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant macular edema was 1.0% over 5 years among patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6%, as compared with 4.3% over 3 years among patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 10%. Over a 20-year period, the frequency of eye examinations was 58% lower with our practical, evidence-based schedule than with routine annual examinations, which resulted in substantial cost savings.

conclusionsOur model for establishing an individualized schedule for retinopathy screening on the basis of the patient's current state of retinopathy and glycated hemoglobin level reduced the frequency of eye examinations without delaying the diagnosis of clinically significant disease. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; DCCT/EDIC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00360893 and NCT00360815 .).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic RetinopathyDisease ProgressionEvidence-Based MedicineFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansMacular EdemaMarkov ChainsPhotographyPractice Guidelines as TopicRetinaRisk FactorsVisual AcuityGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID28423305
PMCPMC5557280
OpenAlexW2612354450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.