Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28432032›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes2017

Neuronal excitation and permeabilization by 200-ns pulsed electric field: An optical membrane potential study with FluoVolt dye.

Andrei G Pakhomov, Iurii Semenov, Maura Casciola, Shu Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrei G PakhomovFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA. Electronic address: 2andrei@pakhomov.net.
Iurii SemenovFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Maura CasciolaFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Shu XiaoFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Old Dominion University · US

Funding

Picosecond pulse technology for non-invasive electrostimulationR21EB016912 · NIBIB · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI PAKHOMOV, ANDREI G, XIAO, SHU · 2014 to 2015
$393k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric field pulses of nano- and picosecond duration are a novel modality for neurostimulation, activation of Ca

Indexed as

ElectricityMembrane PotentialsAction PotentialsAnimalsCell Membrane PermeabilityElectroporationFluorescent DyesNeuronsOptics and PhotonicsRatsFluorescent DyesElectropermeabilizationElectroporationExcitationMembrane permeabilityNanoporesNanosecond pulses

Identifiers

PMID28432032
PMCPMC5484080
OpenAlexW2606788194

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.