Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28440483›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2017

Human osteopontin: Potential clinical applications in cancer (Review).

Chengcheng Hao, Yuxin Cui, Sionen Owen, Wenbin Li, Shan Cheng, Wen G Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  16. What is new in cancer-associated fibroblast biomarkers?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chengcheng HaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, P.R. China.
Yuxin CuiCardiff China Medical Research Collaborative, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Sionen OwenCardiff China Medical Research Collaborative, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Wenbin LiDepartment of Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, P.R. China.
Shan ChengDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, P.R. China.
Wen G JiangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human osteopontin (OPN) is a glycosylated phosphoprotein which is expressed in a variety of tissues in the body. In recent years, accumulating evidence has indicated that the aberrant expression of OPN is closely associated with tumourigensis, progression and most prominently with metastasis in several tumour types. In this review, we present the current knowledge on the expression profiles of OPN and its main splice variants in human cancers, as well as the potential implications in patient outcome. We also discuss its putative clinical application as a cancer biomarker and as a therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasmsOsteopontinProtein IsoformsOsteopontinProtein IsoformsSPP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28440483
PMCPMC5428945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.