SynthesisOncotarget2017

Metformin is associated with survival benefit in pancreatic cancer patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ping-Ting Zhou, Bo Li, Fu-Rao Liu, Mei-Chao Zhang, Qian Wang, Yan-Yan Li, Ci Xu, Yuan-Hua Liu, Yuan Yao, Dong Li

Open access · diamondFull text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Overall survival (OS)metformin treatment vs non-metformin treatmentcomparator not stated · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.840.73 to 0.96
RESULTS: We found that there was a relative survival benefit associated with metformin treatment compared with non-metformin treatment in both overall survival (OS) ([HR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 - 0.96).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50one trial · 1 family supports, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT000387272,779 enrolled · 1996
HR 0.990.79 to 1.25

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Metformin monotherapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · on this map
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Turkish Gastroenterology Association, Pancreas Study Group, Chronic Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ping-Ting ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bo LiDepartment of Bone Tumor Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fu-Rao LiuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Mei-Chao ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan-Yan LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ci XuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan-Hua LiuDepartment of Chemotherapy, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Cancer Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yuan YaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dong LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundPancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with a poor prognosis while metformin has been associated with a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer. Although the benefit of metformin was observed for pancreatic cancer prevention, it is not clear whether it can also affect the survival of pancreatic cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of metformin on the survival of pancreatic cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

methodsTwo independent authors searched PubMed and Web of science up to 08/07/2016. We assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, and examined their quality, with the primary outcome as overall survival. We used published hazard ratio (HR) available or estimated based on other survival data. We pooled the data and used a random-effect model to combine direct comparisons from included articles. We also investigated treatment effects by different countries, quality and the time of metformin initiation.

resultsWe found that there was a relative survival benefit associated with metformin treatment compared with non-metformin treatment in both overall survival (OS) ([HR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 - 0.96). These associations were also observed in subgroups of Asian countries and high quality articles.

conclusionsOur results support the notion that metformin maybe the best anti-diabetic medicine of choice in patients with pancreatic cancer and concurrent type 2 diabetes mellitus. The perspectives of enhancing survival of pancreatic cancer patients with diabetes mellitus by the use of metformin deserve more attention in future research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPancreatic NeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasHypoglycemic AgentsMetformindiabetesmetforminoverall survivalpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID28445955
PMCPMC5421925
OpenAlexW2589747936

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.