Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28450539›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Multisensory Integration Uses a Real-Time Unisensory-Multisensory Transform.

Ryan L Miller, Barry E Stein, Benjamin A Rowland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The multisensory control of sequential actions.Experimental brain research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Morphology and Dendrite-Specific Synaptic Properties of Midbrain Neurons Shape Multimodal Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cross-Modal Competition: The Default Computation for Multisensory Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development of the Mechanisms Governing Midbrain Multisensory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan L MillerDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157.ORCID 0000-0003-4994-7345
Barry E SteinDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157.
Benjamin A RowlandDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157 browland@wakehealth.edu.

Funding

Processing Visual and Multisensory InformationR01EY016716 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEIN, BARRY E · 2007 to 2015
$3.8M
Training Program in Multisensory ProcessesT32NS073553 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEIN, BARRY E · 2011 to 2020
$1.7M
Development of Multisensory IntegrationR01EY024458 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEIN, BARRY E · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016716NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024458NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manner in which the brain integrates different sensory inputs to facilitate perception and behavior has been the subject of numerous speculations. By examining multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus, the present study demonstrated that two operational principles are sufficient to understand how this remarkable result is achieved: (1) unisensory signals are integrated continuously and in real time as soon as they arrive at their common target neuron and (2) the resultant multisensory computation is modified in shape and timing by a delayed, calibrating inhibition. These principles were tested for descriptive sufficiency by embedding them in a neurocomputational model and using it to predict a neuron's moment-by-moment multisensory response given only knowledge of its responses to the individual modality-specific component cues. The predictions proved to be highly accurate, reliable, and unbiased and were, in most cases, not statistically distinguishable from the neuron's actual instantaneous multisensory response at any phase throughout its entire duration. The model was also able to explain why different multisensory products are often observed in different neurons at different time points, as well as the higher-order properties of multisensory integration, such as the dependency of multisensory products on the temporal alignment of crossmodal cues. These observations not only reveal this fundamental integrative operation, but also identify quantitatively the multisensory transform used by each neuron. As a result, they provide a means of comparing the integrative profiles among neurons and evaluating how they are affected by changes in intrinsic or extrinsic factors.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCatsComputer SimulationComputer SystemsCuesMaleNerve NetNeural InhibitionSensory Receptor CellsSuperior ColliculiSystems IntegrationVisual Perceptioncrossmodalmodelingmultisensorysuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID28450539
PMCPMC5444199

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.