ArticleCMAJ open
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sitagliptin, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure: an in-depth review of sitagliptin therapy and heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus.Diabetology international · 2025Review
- DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs: cardiovascular safety and benefits.Military Medical Research · 2022Review
- Fibrosis of the diabetic heart: Clinical significance, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- Optimizing Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Complications in Patients With Heart Failure.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021Article
- The Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Linagliptin Directly Enhances the Contractile Recovery of Mouse Hearts at a Concentration Equivalent to that Achieved with Standard Dosing in Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Challenges to hemoglobin A1c as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of general and family medicine · 2019Review
- Cardiovascular risks in type 2 diabetes and the interpretation of cardiovascular outcome trials.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019Review
- Imbalance in glycemic control between the treatment and placebo groups in cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2019Article
- Autophagy as an emerging target in cardiorenal metabolic disease: From pathophysiology to management.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2018Review
- The pleiotropic cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Review
- Comparative cardiovascular outcomes in the era of novel anti-diabetic agents: a comprehensive network meta-analysis of 166,371 participants from 170 randomized controlled trials.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2018Review
- Cardiovascular Effects of New Oral Glucose-Lowering Agents: DPP-4 and SGLT-2 Inhibitors.Circulation research · 2018Review
- DPP-4 inhibitors and heart failure: a potential role for pharmacogenomics.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Have dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors ameliorated the vascular complications of type 2 diabetes in large-scale trials? The potential confounding effect of stem-cell chemokines.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2018Review
- Treating Disease Mechanisms in Patients With Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus.Current heart failure reports · 2017Review
- Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular Events in Type-2 Diabetes Patients with Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
- Heart Failure Hospitalization with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven recent discrepant results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we examined the totality of RCT evidence assessing the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and heart failure.
methodsMEDLINE, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched without language restrictions to August 2016 for RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors to placebo or no therapy for a period of 24 weeks or more. We included all heart failure outcomes when listed either as a serious adverse event or adverse event. Pooled analyses used random-effects.
resultsWe identified 100 RCTs (
interpretationDespite pooled data from 79 867 patients, whether DPP-4 inhibitors increase heart failure overall or exhibit within-class differences remains unresolved. Our results highlight the importance of ongoing trials that are comparing DPP-4 inhibitors to placebo, although no large cardiovascular-safety RCTs are comparing different DPP-4 inhibitors to each other; consequently, these will address the overall but not class-difference question.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.