Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28461781›Full record

ArticleGreen chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC2016

ZEBRAFISH AS AN IN VIVO MODEL FOR SUSTAINABLE CHEMICAL DESIGN.

Pamela D Noyes, Gloria R Garcia, Robert L Tanguay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Zebrafish and Flavonoids: Adjuvants against Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Cationic Polyacrylamide and Cationic Starch on Aquatic Life.Journal of hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Impacts of isopyrazam exposure on the development of early-life zebrafish (Danio rerio).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pamela D NoyesDepartment of Environmental & Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.
Gloria R GarciaDepartment of Environmental & Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.
Robert L TanguayDepartment of Environmental & Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.

Funding

Research Experience and Training Coordination CoreP42ES016465 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Robyn L Tanguay · 2009 to 2026
$52.5M
MODE OF ACTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICANTST32ES007060 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt, Siva Kumar Kolluri · 1985 to 2026
$11.6M
A conserved long non-coding RNA suppresses Sox9b in AHR target organ toxicityF31ES026518 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GARCIA, GLORIA RENE · 2016 to 2017
$72k
EPA R835796NIEHS NIH HHS F31 ES026518NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES016465NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heightened public awareness about the many thousands of chemicals in use and present as persistent contaminants in the environment has increased the demand for safer chemicals and more rigorous toxicity testing. There is a growing recognition that the use of traditional test models and empirical approaches is impractical for screening for toxicity the many thousands of chemicals in the environment and the hundreds of new chemistries introduced each year. These realities coupled with the green chemistry movement have prompted efforts to implement more predictive-based approaches to evaluate chemical toxicity early in product development. While used for many years in environmental toxicology and biomedicine, zebrafish use has accelerated more recently in genetic toxicology, high throughput screening (HTS), and behavioral testing. This review describes major advances in these testing methods that have positioned the zebrafish as a highly applicable model in chemical safety evaluations and sustainable chemistry efforts. Many toxic responses have been shown to be shared among fish and mammals owing to their generally well-conserved development, cellular networks, and organ systems. These shared responses have been observed for chemicals that impair endocrine functioning, development, and reproduction, as well as those that elicit cardiotoxicity and carcinogenicity, among other diseases. HTS technologies with zebrafish enable screening large chemical libraries for bioactivity that provide opportunities for testing early in product development. A compelling attribute of the zebrafish centers on being able to characterize toxicity mechanisms across multiple levels of biological organization from the genome to receptor interactions and cellular processes leading to phenotypic changes such as developmental malformations. Finally, there is a growing recognition of the links between human and wildlife health and the need for approaches that allow for assessment of real world multi-chemical exposures. The zebrafish is poised to be an important model in bridging these two conventionally separate areas of toxicology and characterizing the biological effects of chemical mixtures that could augment its role in sustainable chemistry.

Indexed as

Developmental toxicityEcotoxicologyEndocrine disrupting chemicalGenomicsGreen chemistryHigh-throughput screening

Identifiers

PMID28461781
PMCPMC5408959

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.