Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28470488›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2017

An Algorithmic Approach to the Management of Gastric Stenosis Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Abhishek Agnihotri, Sindhu Barola, Christine Hill, Manoel Galvao Neto, Josemberg Campos, Vikesh K Singh, Michael Schweitzer, Mouen A Khashab, Vivek Kumbhari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Modified gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for helical stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. GASTRIC TWIST AFTER SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: A PROPOSAL FOR ENDOSCOPIC CLASSIFICATION.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhishek AgnihotriDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sindhu BarolaDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Christine HillDiversity Summer Internship Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Manoel Galvao NetoDepartment of Surgery, Herbert Wertheim School of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Josemberg CamposUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Vikesh K SinghDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael SchweitzerDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mouen A KhashabDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vivek KumbhariDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. vkumbhari@gmail.com.
Johns Hopkins University · USFlorida International University · USUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric stenosis (GS) is a potential adverse event post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Endoscopic management is preferred; however, there is significant variation in therapeutic strategies with no defined algorithm. This study aims to describe the safety and efficacy of a predefined step-wise algorithm for endoscopic management of GS post-LSG.

methodsConsecutive patients with symptomatic GS post-LSG, presenting between July 2015 and August 2016, were subjected to a predefined treatment algorithm of serial dilations using achalasia balloons, followed by a fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) if dilations were inadequate. Patients who did not respond or opted out of ongoing endoscopic therapy were offered revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

resultsTotal of 17 patients underwent a median of 2 (range 1-4) balloon dilations. Twelve patients (70.6%) reported clinical improvement with balloon dilation alone, while 3 (17.6%) required subsequent FCSEMS placement. One patient suffered a tear to the muscularis propria with balloon dilation, which was managed conservatively. Overall, 15 (88.2%) reported clinical improvement with endoscopic management. PAGI-SYM scores revealed that the strongest response to therapy, based on mean reduction of score ± SD, was in the following items: nausea (3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001), heartburn during day (2.8 ± 1.5, P = 0.003), heartburn on lying down (3.4 ± 1.4, P < 0.001), reflux during day (2.8 ± 1.9, P < 0.001), and reflux on lying down (3.0 ± 1.9, P < 0.001). Two (11.8%) patients failed endoscopic therapy and underwent RYGB.

conclusionsEndoscopic management of GS using the described algorithmic approach is safe and effective post-LSG. Patients with severe stenosis or helical stenosis are likely to require revision RYGB.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultCatheterizationConstriction, PathologicDilatationEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleGastrectomyGastric BalloonGastric BypassGastric StumpGastroesophageal RefluxHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedBalloon dilationFully covered self-expandable metallic stentGastric stenosisSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID28470488
OpenAlexW2611199044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.