Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28503092›Full record

ReviewCurrent genomics2017

Management of Gene Variants of Unknown Significance: Analysis Method and Risk Assessment of the

Daniela Alosi, Marie Luise Bisgaard, Sophie Nowak Hemmingsen, Lotte Nylandsted Krogh, Hanne Birte Mikkelsen, Marie Louise Mølgaard Binderup

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Developing a disease-specific annotation protocol for VHL gene curation using Hypothes.is.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  3. Hereditary Endocrine Tumor Registries.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela AlosiDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie Luise BisgaardDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sophie Nowak HemmingsenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lotte Nylandsted KroghDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Hanne Birte MikkelsenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie Louise Mølgaard BinderupDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of the pathogenicity of a gene variant of unknown significance (VUS) is crucial for molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling, but can be challenging. This is especially so in phenotypically variable diseases, such as von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL). vHL is caused by germline mutations in the VHL gene, which predispose to the development of multiple tumors such as central nervous system hemangioblastomas and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

objectiveWe propose a method for the evaluation of VUS pathogenicity through our experience with the VHL missense mutation c.241C>T (p.P81S).

method1) Clinical evaluation of known variant carriers: We evaluated a family of five VHL p.P81S carriers, as well as the clinical characteristics of all the p.P81S carriers reported in the literature; 2) Evaluation of tumor tissue via genetic analysis, histology, and immunohistochemistry (IHC); 3) Assessment of the variant's impact on protein structure and function, using multiple databases, in silico algorithms, and reports of functional studies.

resultsOnly one family member had clinical signs of vHL with early-onset RCC. IHC analysis showed no VHL protein expressed in the tumor, consistent with biallelic VHL inactivation. The majority of in silico algorithms reported p.P81S as possibly pathogenic in relation to vHL or RCC, but there were discrepancies. Functional studies suggest that p.P81S impairs the VHL protein's function.

conclusionThe VHL p.P81S mutation is most likely a low-penetrant pathogenic variant predisposing to RCC development. We suggest the above-mentioned method for VUS evaluation with use of different methods, especially a variety of in silico methods and tumor tissue analysis.

Indexed as

Genetic screeningMissense mutationRenal cell carcinomaVariant of unknown significanceVHL geneVon Hippel-Lindau disease

Identifiers

PMID28503092
PMCPMC5321774
OpenAlexW2565727356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.